You should be discussing this new information with your attorney--THAT person knows all the case facts, all the history, all the evidence and THAT person is best suited to address the very specific nature of your question.
READ THIS BEFORE CALLING OR EMAILING ME: I am licensed to practice before the state and federal courts in Virginia. We have not established an attorney-client relationship unless we have a signed representation agreement and you have paid me. I am providing educational instruction only--not legal advice. You should speak with an attorney to whom you have provided all the facts, before you take steps that may impact your legal rights. I am not obligated to answer subsequent emails or phone calls unless you have hired me. I wish you the best of luck with your situation.
If the information could have been discovered prior to the trial, it is unlikely that the belated discovery of the information will serve as a basis to attack the judgment.
If this answer was helpful, please mark it as helpful or as a best answer. This answer is for general education purposes only. It neither creates an attorney-client relationship nor provides legal guidance or advice. The answer is based on the limited information provided and the answer might be different had additional information been provided. You should consult an attorney.
You are in a difficult position. If this is information you could have discovery with due diligence prior to the trial, it will be difficult to do anything? I would ask for a new hearing based on a change in financial circumstance of the other person and ask for more support. You will need to be able to lay a proper foundation to establish the documents are genuine and trustworthy. Talk to your attorney about this issue and follow their advice.
Legal disclaimer:This message does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Any statements are made for general informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client privilege is created by this communication. Attorney is licensed in California only.
If you have admissible evidence that showed the other side lied in its disclosure papers, and the court relied on those wrong numbers in setting support, you can seek a modification. Talk to your atty to see if you can get the proof in a form acceptable to the court. Hopefully the judge will be more angry at the lying party than at you for not getting the evidence before.
A motion for rehearing is possible, although from the fact you have recited it seems unlikely to be granted.
Talk to your lawyer about this!
This is a summary based on incomplete facts. You should not rely on it as legal advise. No attorney-client relationship is intended to be formed. You may call me 772-562-4570; email me firstname.lastname@example.org, or visit my website http://www.millerlawoffices.us