A few things occur to me as I look at your question:
1. Having reviewed many, many recording contracts in the past, I can say that the clause you quote is unusually worded and very amateurishly drafted. Also, why, for example, is there a reference to 'this management agreement?"
If you want to have a contract that is clear and that isn't likely to possibly create all kinds of problems for you in the future (due to various ambiguities in the contract), you need to have somebody work on this on your behalf who knows what they are doing. The fact that you have to even ask or wonder what this clause means, that's a real red flag here. (Sorry to be so blunt.)
2. In most cases when a label presents an artist with a contract which is not clear or professionally drafted, that's the first red sign that the label in generally doesn't conduct its business very professionally. There are probably exceptions to that generalization, but still, it's always a red flag.
3. Also, if you have your own attorney review a contract this poorly drafted, it will usually increase your legal cost (as opposed to if the contract were professionally done), since it's takes substantially more time for an artist's attorney to review ( and get corrected) a poorly drafted contract than it takes to review a professionally drafted contract.
3. In most instances in which a label is acquiring rights in previously recorded recordings, it is made VERY clear in the contract that they are acquiring those rights. Also, traditionally a separate "acquisition price" has been paid for the label's acquisition of ownership of the pre-existing masters. That's not so much true anymore. I just looked at the first draft of two new major label 360 deals last week and in both cases the label was acquiring rights in all pre-existing masters and not paying anything for them. From an artist point of view, that is something that the artist's attorney should try to negotiate out of the contract. In some situations, the label is willing to do that, and in other situations, not willing. It depends on which major label it is, and also on how much, if any, negotiating leverage you have.
The above is not intended as legal advice and does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship, as this forum does not provide for a confidential communication.
I can appreciate how articulate you are being in framing your question but the truth of the matter is that you need to retain an entertainment attorney to review the terms of your agreement and give you a legal opinion.
I agree with Attorney Parron. Consult with an Entertainment Attorney who will review your contract an advise you accordingly.
Law Offices of J Thomas Smith J.D., Ph.D 11500 Northwest Freeway, Suite 280 Houston, TX 77092 713-LAWYER-2 www.MyImmigrationLawyer.info NOTE: Responses are for the education of the community at large and is not intended to be "legal advice." No attorney-client relationship is established by responses or comments.
The language you quoted looks like it was pulled from a contract. If it's a contract that an attorney prepared for you, your best bet is to ask he or she to explain it. If you are trying to put together your own contract and you found the above paragraph in a form somewhere and are trying to figure out what it means and whether you should use it, that says to me that you're trying to fit someone else's form document to cover your business, in which case I also advise you to get to an entertainment lawyer and have something drafted that is right for you. Either way, I join the chorus here: go get some good legal advice for yourself.
If my answer was helpful to you, I would appreciate if you would mark it either "helpful" or "best answer" if you feel that applies, as AVVO gives us rating points based on feedback. Thank you! Please note that the above answer is not to be construed as legal advice. It is my personal opinion based on your question, and it was given without obtaining the detailed information that I would normally request in order to render comprehensive legal advice. I advise you to consult with a local attorney of your choosing to obtain specific legal advice. The fact that I answered your question does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and me.
Like the other attorneys noted, the clause is not a model of clarity. From the poor draftsmanship, and the inclusion of the extraneous term "management agreement," I would speculate that the label is not a true label with any real power to do anything with your sound recordings. At best, they may be able to introduce you to a real record company and claim a big piece of it. I'm not sure if it is ever worthwhile signing such agreements. Good luck.
No attorney client relationship is created with this post and no legal advice has been rendered. This is for general informational purposes only and does not apply to any specific set of facts which have been reviewed by me. The information contained in this response has not been verified and is not necessarily accurate or reliable, or applicable to any particular jurisdiction. Always hire a licensed attorney to represent your legal interests.