Where can I find examples or procedures on amending to conform to proof at trial? Other question is can I get an acquittal / dismissal of the unwarranted and retaliatory 3 year permanent injunction (had it now for 1 year so far) without amending my complaint? Judge Frazier urged us to "mediate for a global resolution". Can I take it back to him after this defamation case is over and when I prevail? There was no sexual assault. Evidences were not reviewed. I also got two witness statements in March 8, 2010, came too late but still can be used here.
And reason I think I need to amend my complaint. Again unless I don't need to as she asserted to claim privilege w/ the RO in her SLAPPback that was denied on 11/5/09. 1. What does it mean to amend to conform to proof? 2. Can I resolve the RO?1. There was a "legitimate purpose" on contacting the defendant. 2. There is clear and convincing evidence, including defendant's own emails, phone logs, and statements that prove there was no sexual assault. 3. Unfortunately for me, or men in general as it seems, you are SOL in TRO complaints. No evidences were reviewed. Even new one at the motion hearing. 4. Since defendant asserted privilege using the RO and she was denied in this defamation action, can I litigate to resolve the RO and take it back to the TRO dept to dismiss / vacate? 5. Do I need to amend my complaint to include this to resolve in this case even still? That really would be the only reason why I would pursue to ask to "amend to conform to proof at trial". Which if required, where to find info on how to do this correctly would be helpful. Thank you.