We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
settlement agreement was written by attorneys. opposing side wanted to remove several phases, that protect me, that was written by my attorneys. Now my attorneys want me to agree to the edited version even though it does leave vagueness and loopholes for ex to sue me again, which he has done multiple times, or threatened in way to harrass me and make my life hell. I want to be assured throughly in verbage that there are no loopholes or gray areas for him to come after me again legally. The lawyers dont share the concern about the phrases the ex's attorneys took out. there are reasons why they'd want certain phrases taken out to benefit their client, not my best interest obviously. My attorneys just want case over and get paid and are angry that I want to have it the right/original waycase is divorce settlement post trial, and global settlement for taxes, marital assets, to end all lawsuits,appeals etc from both sides. the parts that give obligation for him was removed, while they added obligations to me that was not mutual, all which is contrary to the verbal agreement made in settlement hearing.
Sign up to receive a 10-part series of useful information and legal advice about the divorce process.