Defendant's attorney filed TMO with objections to every single exhibit, every single witness of mine. Judge granted with amendments as follows : that the matter is governed by CRCP 16.1 and therefore does not require a TMO. He went on to state that "The TMO is not binding on further proceedings in this case."
Can someone explain exactly what he meant? I am hoping this helps me as I am pro se and defendant's attorney has gone overboard by trying to ruin my entire case by excessive multiple objections to every item and witness, no holds barred. This is a simple debt collection case.
Thanks in advance.