Skip to main content

What are the best results from a Paid Lawyer to a Court appointed ? I don't want to pay if I'm going to get the same results.

San Antonio, TX |

Second DWI first one was 8yrs ago. Officer is saying I denied the Breathalyzer test when I know I told him I didn't understand what he was telling me closed door and took me in. He got a warrant for my blood.

+ Read More

Attorney answers 5


The difference is usually experience. A misdemeanor court appointed lawyer is rather young and inexperienced. If he pleads you out he will get $100.00 It is hard to say what the results will be between a court appointed and paid lawyer, however it is my belief that when you pay for a lawyer you will get a more experienced and aggressive defense.


If you do not qualify for a court appointed lawyer, you are not going to get one. If you have the ability to pay a lawyer, and apparently you do, then you must hire a lawyer.

The difference is generally not much if you hire a cheap lawyer because it is likely their experience is no more than a court appointed. DWI lawyers are VERY expensive - like $5,000 plus.



What if that's their field? I mean some do all around from Divorce to DWI's, but some are more experienced in their field of DWI. I have a lawyer in mind and I had to get a loan, it's not that I have the money out of pocket but I will do anything to pursue what's right. I'm the type of person that will take any charges if I knew I did wrong. But in this case I wasn't drunk and over the limit. I hadn't eaten, I slept only 6 hours the night before, I had a 4 hour window before they even took the blood test. The Officer was really rude and I understand that that's his job but we are not all the same. I treated him with respect answered his questions truthfully and never gave him attitude. I understand that he knows what to say for the Breathalyzer test but when some says they don't understand then why don't they take the time to make the person understand them instead of insinuating that I lied and denied the Breathalyzer test. Like I said I had to take out a loan to pay a lawyer but I am going to do my research in what is best for my situation.


Let me premise my answer by saying I have not practiced in your county, so I am not familiar with the appointment system there. I would defer to Mr. Churak in that regard.

I practice in the same county as Ms. Henley, so when she writes that it is "apparent" you will not qualify for an appointed attorney, I am inclined to agree. She means you are out on bond, and, here in Harris County, the logic of most judges is that if you can afford bond, you can afford an attorney. Not exactly grounded in reality, but there ya have it.

And yes, as Mr. Churak points out, it is more likely to get appointed a lawyer with limited experience, at least in misdemeanor courts. Been there. In my thinking, however, that does not very often mean they are incompetent and, in fact, may be a bit more passionate about the practice of law than some seasoned professionals (I made a vow to myself years ago to quit if I ever got jaded).

A problem often occurs when they are appointed a half dozen or more cases in a day. They may not have the time your case properly needs to review it. If you are incarcerated, they will not waste any time with any one on the outside who is concerned about you and may only be seeing you at court settings. Another problem is that appointed attorneys that aren't shy about taking cases to trial often find themselves without appointments eventually.

DWI is a more technical charge than many others and if you think you should fight it, get someone who regularly practices in that area.

24 years in Texas Family Law and Criminal Defense.


You have no idea what result to expect, except lawyers who aren't trained and experienced in
DWI cases don't know what to look for. Court appointed lawyers might be very good or very inexperienced criminal lawyers, but none has the special training and experience of a real DWI lawyer.


The consideration in court-appointed versus retained isn't supposed to be what they can do for you. It's supposed to be whether or not you're indigent. If you can afford to hire someone, you're supposed to hire someone.

That being said, there are some amazing, experienced attorneys who do court-appointed work in Bexar County, even on misdemeanors, but they are few and far between. The majority of the lawyers working misdemeanors here are either inexperienced, or just plead everything and never go to trial - those are the ones running a volume business. If you end up with a court-appointed attorney, you will get a good feel of it your lawyer is a fighter or not.

Keep in mind that there are attorneys you can hire who are the same. Every single attorney who does court-appointed work also does retained work. Ethically, that attorney should treat every single client the same and work each case as diligently, but realistically and sadly, there are few that do so, in my opinion.

Regardless of if you are able to hire someone or if you have to apply for court-appointed (in Bexar County, you can still qualify even if you're on bond - they barely consider that), you should be looking for the same things. Has the attorney tried DWIs? What is the lawyer's background? How many trials have they done? How quickly do they seem to turn over their cases? Do they sound like they know what they are doing? Is there advice consistent with what your gut says? When it isn't, are they able to answer your questions in a way that makes sense? Trust your gut.

I intend this answer to be for general information only and it should not be substituted for advice from an experienced local lawyer who can investigate your situation fully. My practice area spans primarily across South and Central Texas. If you want to retain my services for a different part of the state, I will have to charge you for my travel, and it will likely be more cost-effective to retain local counsel. My contact information, and that for all attorneys on Avvo can be found by clicking on our names.