Skip to main content

What are the benefits of filing an Attorney Ethics Grievance Form?

Somerset, NJ |

I am thinking there is a code and you all stick together however, I ponder anyway because lawyers I spoke with at seminars and clinics during my divorce were just appalled at my lawyers behavior
I not only had an incompetent attorney who lied and gave me misinformation every step of the way those times she actually responded to my calls and emails BUT then went into court appointed mediation without my consent, kept threatening to file a motion if I did not just do when she said without questioning her and then shut her office down before finishing the property settlement and demanded I retain her at new firm she was now working or I was on my own!What ever comes of it?What r benefits?Can I recoup my retainer? In recent convos with ex's att she concurs that my attorne was a horror show!

+ Read More

Attorney answers 2


If the court ordered mediation you don't get to consent.

It should not matter to you what firm she is associated with, she maintained her relationship with you. She is your lawyer, and the firm she is at does not affect her responsibilities or behavior to you. Doctors and lawyers cannot sign a "noncompete" because it would not be fair to the clients who want to stay with their lawyer, so this is common.
You will owe her for whatever hours she put in, regardless of what you decide to do in the future as long as she has not committed malpractice. When you hire a lawyer she has certain duties. However, the TACTICS (motions etc) are her choice - you don't get to micromanage the lawyer you hire. You DO have the right to see any offers and decide whether to accept them. She did not abandon the property settlement just because she finishes it at the new firm. Nothing you mention rises to the level of malpractice. And if you think lawyers stick together, try to sue a doctor.
That being said, you are free to end your relationship with her and get another if you want - but NOT to refuse to pay for what she has done. That's probably in your contract.
There is a code that requires ethical behavior. We usually agree because it is the best answer, not because we like each other.

This should not be considered legal advice and is intended for educational purposes only. It does not constitute a contract for legal services between any parties. Answers are given to questions for which there may be additional facts not mentioned which might change the legal issues or consequences.


First, the NJ courts web page has a form you can download and use to file an ethics grievance. It also has a form you can download to file a fee grievance. Ethics and fee disputes are handled by separate committees. Second, if you truly think your client committed malpractice, then invest in a consultation with a legal malpractice attorney. Expect to pay a consultation fee. Lastly, drop the attitude. The mere fact that there are plenty of lawyers who are willing to sue other lawyers should tell you we don't "all" stick together.
A couple of general points: Mediation is usually court-ordered. There is no consent involved. There is nothing unethical or which constitutes malpractice if a lawyer shuts her practice and joins another firm. If your retainer agreement requires you to pay her for her time and expenses, then that is what you owe. Good luck.

A response to a question posted on Avvo is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. It is informational only.



Perhaps, I did not make my two points clear........ It was not that she closed her office and went to another firm: It was that if I already paid her a retainer I do not see how it is fair to force me to pay ANOTHER retainer? I really did not care what office she worked at as long as she worked. Secondly, I know that consent is not required for mediation......however, the woman left me outside the room and met with the 2 mediators and adversary and ex husband WITHOUT getting MY CONSENT! she told me she was just going to ask him and his attorney a few financial questions that she was not clear on and NEVER CAME BACK.........I was the ONLY one NOT in the room and I did not give her consent to do that ...I would never have allowed her to do that, I and everyone else already knew she was incapable and incompetent...........I was in shock when she came out and told me it was done. The mediators commented how "they had never seen two lawyers get along so well" why? because he had a wonderful competent knowledgeable lawyer looking out for her clients best interest and mine just said yes to everything because she was out of her league. Geez, she did not even know what "ownership" of an insurance policy meant! I myself, had to find out at a free legal clinic !How I had to get all my info! No attitude here, Allan..........just a horror show of incompetency Thank you

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer