Unless the paternity judgment (or other postjudment order, if any) states that the father's placement is to be supervised, then you could be found in contempt for only permitting the father to have supervised placement. Contempt Actions are fact specific, and even when their is a technical violation of a court order, the court may not necessary find a party in contempt if the action/violation was appropriate or justified under the circumstances. Chances are that the placement order grants the father "periods of physical placement upon reasonable times and upon reasonable notice". If the father has had no involvement, but all of a sudden wants 1 full week (including overnights), you may be right to think this is "not reasonable time". If you deny his request, the father could petition the court for enforcement/contempt. You will then be given the opportunity to say that the father's request was not "reasonable". While the court may agree with you that the week long placement is not reasonable, you have a much weaker arugment when it comes to adding the additional condition that the father's visitation be supervised. Hope this helps.
My answer does not make me your attorney or create a former-client/current-client relationship with you. I encourage you to speak with an attorney before acting upon any of the statements I make. If you would like to speak with me further about your issue, please schedule a free initial consultation (in person or over the phone) by calling my office at (920) 459-8490, or by emailing me at email@example.com. You can also visit www.klpplaw.com for more information.Ask a similar question
Sign up to receive a 5-part series of useful information and advice about child custody law.