"What are the complications?" There are many.
If the house it to be yours, then it should just be yours. How will you be able to refinance it or draw a line of credit if his name is on title.
What if he gets sued and loses. Then YOUR house could be executed against to satisfy HIS debt.
What if he doesn't pay taxes. The IRS will put a lien on your house.
What if he gets busted for dealing drugs. (OK, I know that's farfetched, but it could happen and you'd lose your house.)
What if the house increases in value. Later, he'll want "his share" of the increased value, most likely, although he won't deserve it.
You are MUCH better off clearing title to these properties altogether, NOW, while the issue is before the court.
Frankly, you're in over your head. Hire an attorney to help you navigate these rocky waters. Many attorneys are good at settling out of court.
Legal disclaimer: The response given is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be anything other than the educated opinion of the author. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response might possibly change. Attorney is licensed to practice law only in the State of California. Responses are based solely on California law unless stated otherwise.Ask a similar question
You will want to review whatever agreement you have with an experienced family law attorney prior to signing anything. They can discuss the pros and cons of your agreement and warn you of any problems or potential problems.
Michael Schwerin, San Jose, California phone: 408-295-4232 email: email@example.com. Consultation fees, rates and retainers vary based on need and ability to pay.Ask a similar question
The ramifications are based upon how the names are placed on title. But if you place his name on a title, then you are admitting that he has an ownership interest in the house. If you believe that you will be awarded the full value of the house, then why agree to less? Set the matter for trial.Ask a similar question
Mr.Yomtov has given you a very clear articulation of reality. Take a look at the movies The War of the Roses and Sleeping with the Enemy. Your listening for advice from the enemy. You are not going to do too well. It sounds as if his thoughts are misplaced and you are going to be entirely taken advantage of. Don’t walk but run to a- competent experienced family law lawyer and let a professional handle this mess.
If you have found this information helpful, please let the attorney know by marking best answer. Thank you. This participating Attorney does not warrant any information provided, nor are we creating an Attorney-Client relationship by providing said information to you on this site. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute, offer, induce, promise, or contract of any kind. The content provided is presented as a courtesy to be used only for informational purposes and is not represented to be error free. The Law Offices of John N. Kitta makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to its answer to inquiries, and such representations and warranties are being expressly disclaimed. Given limited facts, we are attempting to share relevant information concerning this area of the law as a public service.Ask a similar question
You need a lawyer that understands finances and can help you to resolve the issue out of the courts without complications. Some of us in avvo like me we specialize in those kind of situations. Give us a call
Disclaimer:Attorney and Fraud Examiner.One of few that are Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE). The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as a legal advice on any subject. No recipients of content from this site,clients or otherwise,should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Karamanlis Powers Law Offices expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this website, weblogs, twitter, facebook, google+. *the certification is not a specialty recognized by the California State Bar.Ask a similar question
I agree with Mr. Yomtov as well and I usually recommend against a property being held jointly by the Parties after divorce. Furthermore there may be tax implications that your Husband has not considered (for example you may not both qualify for the joint capital gains exclusion since he would not be residing in the residence for a requisite number of years after the divorce).
However under limited situations, Parties can agree to continue to maintain joint ownership, but an agreement for doing so has to be drafted very carefully with time limitations and a way out should one of you want to sell the property. I would suggest that before you further consider your Husband's proposal you first consult with a skilled family law specialist and a CPA (or tax attorney) about possible tax ramifications of such a deal.Ask a similar question
Sign up to receive a 10-part series of useful information and legal advice about the divorce process.