Even though the order states he shall have the child from 9 - 6 and he showed up at 11 does not mean he was in violation of the visitation order just because he was late. If he is persistently getting her late or not bringing her back on time, you could bring the matter back to Court to modify the visitation order. If you do not let him have the child despite the fact that he showed up late, you will be in violation of the visitation order and could face consequences. To be sure, you should consult with an experienced family law attorney.
Former Prosecutor and Family Court Law Clerk. I am available for phone consultations at (914) 368-2646. This answer is very general and is not intended to be specific legal advice and does not create any attorney/client relationship. Please consult an attorney with the specifics of your case to determine your best course of action in or out of court
I agree with M. Campbell. Visitation is a right, not something which is compelled. Showing up late in this instance, if it is infrequent, does not give you the right to withhold visitation (or type in all caps :-).
If the father called the cops, they would probably not intervene, but he could petition the Family Court for an order enforcing the custody order and finding you in willful contempt, which could at least theoretically result in your imprisonment in extreme cases. If such a petition were brought, and this problem with "hand off" times for visitation was an issue for you, you could petition to modify the visitation provisions.
But generally the courts will allow the non-custodial parent reasonable visitation, even if it's not being fully exercised, to promote family relationships, especially if the NCP is also timely paying any support ordered and is not in arrears.
You may wish to consult a family court lawyer, or engage in the mediation programs offerred by many family courts, often for no charge.
This answer is provided under the Avvo.com “Terms and Conditions of Use” (“ToU”), particularly ¶9 which states that any information provided is not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship between you and me or any other attorney. Such information is intended for general informational purposes only and should be used only as a starting point for addressing your legal issues. In particular, my answers and those of others are not a substitute for an in-person or telephone consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction about your specific legal issue, and you should not rely solely upon Legal Information you obtain from this website or other resources which may be linked to an answer for informational purposes. You understand that questions and answers or other postings to the Site are not confidential and are not subject to attorney-client privilege. The full Avvo ToU are set forth at http://www.avvo.com/support/terms . In addition, while similar legal principles often apply in many states, I am only licensed to practice in the State of New York and Federal Courts. Any general information I provide about non-New York laws should be checked with an attorney licensed to practice in your State. Lastly, New York State Court rules (22 NYCRR Part 1200, Rule 7.1) also require me to inform you that my answers and attorney profile posted on the Avvo.com site may be considered "attorney advertising" and that "prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome".
1. Stop SHOUTING.
2. Denying visitation on Father's Day merely because the father came 2 hours after his visitation window opened is inviting a contempt action.
3. If there are real problems with visitation, such as failing to appear, bringing the child back late or leaving the state, you can bring those before the court if a letter from your attorney does not correct the problem.
The foregoing is for general information purposes and does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
I agree with the previous answers. Moreover, you did the right thing. It is Father's Day. Let him enjoy time with the child and let the child enjoy spending Father's Day with his/her father. Sometimes, it is best to overlook formalities and technicalities. Your child benefits.
Here is my opinion on this subject: http://www.duthelylaw.com/1/post/2013/06/divorce-and-teenagers-minimizing-the-trauma.html
Absent a forfeiture clause in the order/agreement for substantially late collection, you did the right thing.
If you found this "helpful" or "best answer," please click it with my appreciation. My response is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice nor creates an attorney client relationship which requires all the details and a personal conference.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about child custody law.