I could see how all of this legal jargon could be difficult to understand. However, have you asked your lawyer to explain it to you? I ask this because he/she is in the best position to discuss such matters with you, given that he/she is more familiar with your case than any attorney on this website.
Your question is confusing. Since you have had a MSC it means you must be close to a trial date? It sounds like the other party may not have taken your deposition and so filed a proposed order compelling your attendance at the deposition without first filing a petition (or motion) for same? So the court denied the petition/motion? I agree with Ms. Berjis, that you REALLY need to talk to your attorney since it may be close to trial. You should call for a fac to face appointment asap.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. The above answer is for general information only and is based on the information you posted. Every case is fact dependent, so to get a thorough analysis of your situation, you will need to consult face to face with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where the incident took place. Do not conclusively rely on any information posted online when deciding what to do about your case. No attorney-client relationship shall be created through the use reading of this response on Avvo. You should never delay seeking legal advice, disregard legal advice, or commence or discontinue any legal action because of information in this response.
You are represented you should talk to your lawyer about this issue and your case. If there was a motion your lawyer filed to prevent your deposition for some reason and it was granted, it means you don't have to attend the deposition.
Legal disclaimer:This message does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Any statements are made for general informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client privilege is created by this communication. Attorney is licensed in California only.
It sounds like you are in a legal process where there was a hearing at which you learned there had been a settlement offer and your attorney asked for two weeks to get you a better offer.
Legally, attorneys are required to confer with you, the client, if a settlement offer is made. They cannot make the decision for you. If you attorney advised you to wait for a better offer, then they should have followed up on that, presuming you gave them permission, which requires you fully understanding what is being explained to you and what your options are.
That your attorney did not get back to before further court procedure occurred is troubling. I would hope that the attorney is not "covering their tracks" for trying to get a bigger offer, but provoking the other side to withdraw their entire offer.
Your attorney might be liable for malpractice in this situation. BUT, rather than confront them with that fact, first write them a letter asking them to:
1) confirm that he/she received an offer from opposing counsel;
2) confirm that he/she communicated that offer to you, which you understood;
3) confirm that he/she asked you for your input about different settlement options;
4) confirm that he/she proceeded with your permission to make a count-offer;
5) alert your attorney that have waited two weeks to learn of the results of this settlement process.
If you hand them a written letter, requesting a written reply as soon as possible, then at the very least, your attorney understands, implicitly, that you are participating in your own case and are ensuring that things proceed in a documented fashion, which is your right to request, to your satisfaction.
And if your attorney gives you a difficult time, or is non-responsive, you may consider asking the judge for a continuance on your upcoming hearing until such time as you have had time to find a new attorney.
This answer is provided as per the terms and conditions of Avvo.com, and it in no way establishes any attorney-client relationship between any parties reading or relying upon this answer. Members of the public are always advised to seek their own independent legal counsel before making any decision or initiating any action.