Say something happened to someone you know... you had nothing to do with it, but because they blamed you in a statement to avoid revocation themselves, your PO revocates you on the assumption you did something just because someone else said you did? There's no proof either way who was responsible and there were no charges pressed against anyone. The person doing the blaming gave several conflicting stories and none of them make sense. Shouldn't you be innocent until proven guilty...not guilty until you can prove you are innocent. How can you fight this??