It is not clear from this post what it is you need to know and in what context. But I offer this info: the most useful kind of dismissal in my view is pursuant to Penal Code section 1385 in the interests of justice. There is California case law authority which holds that dismissal on this ground "had same effect as if Deft had never been charged or prosecuted..." And: "… dismissal in furtherance of justice of the charge underlying a prior conviction operates, as a matter of law, to erase the prior conviction as if the Deft had never suffered the conviction in the initial instance. … The deft stands as if he had never been prosecuted for the alleged offense."
Peo. v. Barrro, 2001, 93 CA4th 62
Peo v Carrasco, 2008, 163 CA 4th 978
No legal advice here. READ THIS BEFORE you contact me! My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. I give legal advice ONLY in the course of a formal attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by joint execution of a written agreement for legal services. My law firm does not provide free consultations. Please do not call or write to me with a “few questions” that require me to analyze the specific facts of your history and your license application and prescribe for you how to get a State license. Send me an email to schedule a paid Consultation for that kind of information, direction, and assistance. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic challenges to universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We take cases of wrongful termination or employment discrimination only if the claims involve peace officers, universities or colleges.
I think you posted this question already. However, both dismissals under PC Section 1385 will show up on a rap sheet as the same, other than the fact that one dismissal will be "in the interest of justice" and the other is "insufficent evidence." It makes little difference, in most contexts which of the two dismissals happened. his question is probably better answered with more detail. It may depend on whom is doing the background check and for what reason.
Dismissals, expungements, and even sealing of juvenile records do not make them "disappear" as if they never happened. Depending on the circumstances certain parties can still find out about these. In these days of the internet where every detail of your life is on file somewhere whether you want it or not, a determined employer (or pretty much anyone else) could find out what you ate for breakfast yesterday if they really wanted to. The question you must ask yourself is: Would you really want to work for an employer who is concerned about a criminal charge that never resulted in a conviction?
The response above is not intended as legal advice. This response does not create an attorney-client relationship. Legal questions can only be fully answered through consultation with an attorney to whom you give full and accurate details. Anything you post here is not confidential and is not protected by the attorney-client relationship. It is highly recommended that you seek advice from a criminal defense attorney licensed in your jurisdiction by setting up a confidential meeting.
Technically speaking when the DA voluntarily dismisses a case it is always under PC 1385 "in the interests of justice" and they do not have to state their specific reasons. The only thing that will show on a background check when the DA dismisses is just that: "Dismissed PC 1385 interests of justice". However, when the judge dismisses a case under PC 1385, the court minutes must reflect the court's reasons and case law guides the courts on what factors are legit in exercising this great discretion. But, when the court dismisses PC 1385, the background check will likely only show the same as above: "dismissed PC 1385 in the interests of justice". In order for someone to really find out the reasons, then that person should order the transcripts of the court proceedings.
Answers posted herein should not be construed as legal advice. Legal advice will only be given after a consultation wherein the attorney can ask follow up questions and obtain all necessary information about your circumstances.