1. if Plaintiffs showed several Medical study datum regarding about the case on the defendant's misdiagnosis / delay diagnosis of Cancer and potential wrong diagnosis based on the last genetic molecular test took.
2. Pointed out the standard care did not meet based on their published guidelines or the heatlh care standard guidelines either.
3. Pointed out the trend of Kaiser doctors often mis-reading the X-ray, Ct-scan, Biopsy tests, 4 ER discharges within 14 months complaints
Saw similiar cases, CCP 437c, CA2d 441, Taliaferro vs Coakley, 186 CA2d 258; Dryer vs Dryer, 231. My question is can the defense use msj to against the plaintiffs even in Kaiser Arbitration not trials and how to refute it properly? Thank you.Medical doctors can use the same well-published medical study data to back up their beliefs - some of those published papers even came from renowned specialized doctors, so why can't plaintiffs presented it without doctors and without being msj'ed? We also have biotech background on Cancer- we make cancer test strip and vaccines RD work. CA Arbitration no Trial in Court. Attorney without Medical background would not able to help the case either. We hired attorneys for patents & IPO and never work out for us. Hired & Fired attorneys and doing this self since Jan as they only wanted to get paid for doing no work.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.