Rules of Professional Conduct: RULE 1 .9:
Duties to Former Clients
(a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in
a matter shall not thereafter represent another person
in the same or a substantially related matter in
which that person’s interests are materially adverse
to the interests of the former client unless the former
client gives informed consent, confirmed in
(b) Unless the former client gives informed consent,
confirmed in writing, a lawyer shall not knowingly
represent a person in the same or a substantially related
matter in which a firm with which the lawyer
formerly was associated had previously represented
(1) whose interests are materially adverse to that
(2) about whom the lawyer had acquired information
protected by Rules 1.6 or paragraph (c) of
this Rule that is material to the matter.
(c) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in
a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly
represented a client in a matter shall not
(1) use confidential information of the former
client protected by Rule 1.6 to the disadvantage
of the former client, except as these Rules
would permit or require with respect to a current
client or when the information has become
generally known; or
(2) reveal confidential information of the former
client protected by Rule 1.6 except as these
Rules would permit or require with respect to
a current client.
Sorry for this situation, while it may or may not have been the best judgment I do not see a conflict. You may want to make this known to the attorney assigned the defense by the insurance company. They will have an opportunity to explore and move to disqualify. One point of interest, if your former attorney is capable and qualified, he/she knows how to properly process a file which ultimately helps get the case resolved. As a further aside, even if your former attorney refused the case obviously another lawyer would have handled. Nevertheless, I certainly understand that you may feel violated. Good luck.
Personal injury cases only; I'm good at it; you be the Judge! All information provided is for informational and educational purposes only. No attorney client relationship has been formed or should be inferred. Please speak with a local and qualified attorney. I truly wish you and those close to you all the best. Jeff www.nyelderinjurylaw.com
It's insensitive, and not something I would do, but for the reasons Jeff Adams, gave, it's not a conflict of interest.
Any opinions stated in response to Avvo questions are based upon the facts stated in the question. Responses to Avvo questions are for general information purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice.
As suggested, discuss this with the attorney from your carrier. There may or may not be a conflict. But, if not objected to timely, then it is waived. You might inform your carrier and ask to heve legal counsel address the issue. As long as you say nothing else, you might remind the attorney , in writing, that you object to his representation in the current case.
The nondisclosure settlement may be an issue. It is certainly something he knows about you and cannot reveal to his new client.
Personally, I would not have taken the case based on the appearance of impropriety alone.
The above is not intended as legal advice. The response does not constitute the creation of an attorney client relationship as this forum does not provide for a confidential communication.
Unlikely a conflict, but bad form. The ruffian and should not be used again.
The answer does not create an attorney-client relationship and is for informational purposes only.
Lassen Law Firm
1515 Market St #1510
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Licensed in PA & NJ. 29% Contingency Fee. Phone: 215-510-6755 www.InjuryLawyerPhiladelphia.com
While I understand your being upset, it's very possible the lawyer doesn't even realize he is suing a former client. You say your case settled in 2006, six years ago. It's very possible that this lawyer has a large case load, the other driver came to him with a case of liability and he took the case not ever realizing you were his former client. Perhaps an associate took the case but the claim is filed under your lawyer's name. Even so, I doubt this is an ethical violation as it's two completely unrelated legal matters.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.