Damages that can be collected for veterinary malpractice are very limited but the expense and difficulty of such cases are great. You cannot collect anything for your own mental anguish or for the animal's suffering. Therefore, it is not cost effective to retain an attorney for such a case unless the animal has great economic value- like a champion racehorse.
I am a dog lover. I have a dog and I have always had dogs. That is why this answer pains me. Dogs are property under the law. If you have a claim, it will be a property damage claim, not a malpractice claim. Sorry. The question is: did they do something to cause the extra damage? This is best answered by your new vet. If so, you may be able to recover some of your expenses, but that's it.
The answers provided by me in this forum are not to be construed as "legal advice" and in no way should the asker assume that any attorney-client relationship is created by virtue of the answers provided. This is a public forum, therefore, no confidentiality exists.
While veterinary malpractice is a valid cause of action, such suits are very expensive to litigate. It basically becomes a battle of the experts, with one side saying "this is standard procedure" and the other side saying "this is not standard procedure". The fact that your dog might have had a reaction to the sutures is not likely malpractice. If the dog had a staph infection that is also likely not malpractice and your vet will argue that it was something you did that caused the dog to get a staph infection. In addition, the damages awarded are generally not very high unless what the vet did was truly shocking and outrageous - basically, if you win, you might get reimbursed for any medical care.
Short of litigation, you can file a complaint with the American Veterinary Medical Association, http://www.avma.org/
If we do not have a signed fee agreement I am not your attorney and this is not legal advice.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.