I am sorry, there is a well settled body of law holding that municipalities are not responsible for injuries to members of the public caused by their failure to enforce the law. The only exception is if the municipality undertook a duty specifically to the injured party. That does not seem to be the case here.
Any opinions stated in response to Avvo questions are based upon the facts stated in the question. Responses to Avvo questions are for general information purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice.
Your father's claim appears to be better suited against the bike riders than the city. While I understand your situation and would certainly want more laws enforced for speeding bikers, the bikers are the ones that broke the law and therefore the city does not appear to be responsible for your father's injuries. I would consult a New York Attorney in regards to your father's case because his own insurance policy may be able to protect him in this situation.
Attorney Brophy is, unfortunately, spot on. Do call and attorney as you may have omitted some essential fact. Good luck.
Personal injury cases only; I'm good at it; you be the Judge! All information provided is for informational and educational purposes only. No attorney client relationship has been formed or should be inferred. Please speak with a local and qualified attorney. I truly wish you and those close to you all the best. Jeff www.nyelderinjurylaw.com
There is no claim against the City. The claim is against the bike riders.
I am a former federal and State prosecutor and have been doing criminal defense work for over 16 years. I was named to the Super Lawyers list as one of the top attorneys in New York for 2012 and 2013. No more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by Super Lawyers. Martindale-Hubbell has given me its highest rating - AV Preeminent - in the areas of Criminal Law, Personal Injury, and Litigation. According to Martindale-Hubbell”AV Preeminent is a significant rating accomplishment - a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence." Fewer than 8% of attorneys achieve an AV Preeminent rating. I also have the highest ranking – “superb” – on Avvo. The above answer, and any follow up comments or emails is for informational purposes only and not meant as legal advice.
As my colleagues indicate, no claim exists against the City absent a special relationship. Your real claim is against the bicyclist. Not intending to be glib, but you'll have to write your local congressional representative if you feel the rules are inadequate.
Disclaimer- The information you obtain at our web-site or through postings on such sites as this is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for specific advice regarding your individual situation. Any response given here is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response may change appropriately.
Sorry your father was injured. The responsible parties are the bicyclists who can be sued. Suing the city will be difficult if not impossible. Consult with a local personal injury lawyer.
If this answer is helpful, then please mark the helpful button. If this is the best answer, then please indicate it. Thanks. For further information you should see an attorney and discuss the matter completely. If you are in the New York City area, then you can reach me during normal business hours at 718 329 9500 or www.mynewyorkcitylawyer.com.
Unfortunately such a lawsuit would be doomed to fail. The courts have made it clear that absent a showing of what's known as a "special duty". Basically what that means is an agency of government is not generally liable for the negligent performance of a governmental function unless there existed a special duty to the injured person, in contrast to a general duty owed to the public.
So, just because you argue that the city was negligent in enforcing its bicycle laws (or for not creating stricter ones), because there was no special duty to protect your father from runaway bicyclists, the City cannot be held liable.
Your target for a lawsuit are the bicyclists themselves.
There is no case against the city. There is a viable case against the bikers, and the problem is that you do not know their identity. If the accident occurred within the past 30 days, consider surveillance footage of those establishments in the areas surrounding the accident. If you are successful in identifying the bikers, and if those bikers have any form of insurance (including if they live in a home that is insured), you may have a case against them.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.