Is there case law in California that states that a battered spouse should not have to be part of the reunification therapy process with Father-child? The court did not order the spouse to attend but the therapist is requiring it. This new evidence was known after the order was entered by judge to start reunification therapy. Therapist is aware there is a current TRO in place for mother and child, yet she is still insisting upon having both parents participate. Mother still receives threats from Father. Mother and attorney were not present when orders were made; requested continuance; judge denied it. Where can I find free case law that will support motion for reconsideration.