Without a blood test, they should not be able to prove scientifically you were under the influence of anything. Even with an admission. You still may want to set up a DMV hearing just to play it safe and protect your right there. Lots of science to combat, but they need the blood test to prove anything.
Disclaimer: This was not legal advice, and in no way formed an attorney-client relationship.
You indicate that you have a prescription for Xanax, but had you taken any near the time of the accident and what did you tell the officer about when and how much you last medicated with Xanax? I will assume that the officer did not ask you to take a test-thus, you didn't refuse to provide a chemical test of your blood or urine, correct? Did you do field sobriety tests?
It sounds like they have little to no evidence of impairment other than an accident and a very minor accident at that. You could share with us what you were cited for that you have to appear in court. Was it 23152(a) or something else.
Also assume there was no alcohol involved.
What you do in court is see if the DA is going to charge you with anything and then seek the services of a public defender or have an attorney ready to assist you. Why don't you get all of your paperwork together; get an accident report from the reporting police agency and go see an experienced DUI attorney prior to going to court and before the 10th day is us from the day of the accident.
You weren't into custody for a "sobering" period? Even with a prescription drug thats odd when cited for DUI. Either way, like mentioned, you should request a DMV hearing just be on the safe side. Other than that, hard to say exactly what could happen since there was no chemical test done to prove you were under the influence of anything.
Any information provided through Avvo.com in response to a question is not, and cannot be considered a formation of any Attorney-Client relationship. Questioner understands that the nature of this system allows only for a cursory review of case information, and more detailed information should not be divulged in this public forum. As such, Questioner is recommended to contact an Attorney in order to discuss the full details of their case and a more specific advisement of potential rights and liabilities.
In order to prosecute you for DUI, they would have to prove that you were in fact under the influence of something - alcohol or drugs. Without a chemical test of any sort, I doubt they would be able to. You don't mention anything about field sobriety tests or other ways they would be able to prove any impairment aside from the accident itself.
If you were in fact cited and have a court date, it is probably worth sitting down face to face with a local attorney to discuss your options and be ready to fight this if it does get filed in court.
The above answer is for general information only and is based on the information you posted. Every case is fact dependent, so to get a thorough analysis of your situation, you will need to consult face to face with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where the incident took place. Do not conclusively rely on any information posted online when deciding what to do about your case.
DUI DUI defense Admissibility of standardized field sobriety tests DUI as a criminal offense Field sobriety test for DUI Blood test for DUI Refusing a DUI test DUI and DMV hearings DUI charges DUI arrest Driving under the influence of drugs Criminal defense Criminal charges Crimes against society Right to counsel in criminal cases Defenses for criminal charges Criminal arrest Criminal court Admissible evidence in criminal cases
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and legal advice about DUIs.