Reviews and ratings of local lawyers.
Post a review of your attorney.
Learn when to hire and how to choose the right attorney.
Post an anonymous question on our forum and get free advice from multiple lawyers
Starting from $39 - Local, qualified attorneys offer fixed-fee legal services.
For $39 talk directly to a top-reviewed lawyer on the phone using Avvo Advisor. Get your questions answered in a 15-minute call.
Create your legal document in minutes. Add your details, save your work, and invite others to add their electronic signature.
Let the attorney and others know that this information was useful.
Let us know when your receive great advice so we can thank our lawyers and point others with similar questions in the right direction.
MEANING? - Defendant does not acquiesce in the courts ruling and makes these objections solely to make the order consistent with the evidence allowed at trial.
It sounds like this is part of a memorandum of law or a motion in which the Defendant states that his/her/its post-trial objections are made in order to make the ruling consistent with the evidence.
Taken out of context it sounds pretty muddled to me. Perhaps knowing more about the case would make some sense of it, but I think part of the confusion is that it is just poor draftsmanship.
Lawsuits and disputes Motions Evidence Appeals Court basics Civil court
Post a free question on our public forum.
- or -
Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.