Skip to main content


Alhambra, CA |

Once a case has reached a resolution, and the Plaintiff realizes that the amount settled will leave very little after paying everyone's high fees and Medical liens..IS IT PROPER, for the Plaintiff to insist that before signing the release documents, that his attorney RENEGOTIATE with all the lien holders for a reduction in payments ?? IF the attorneys refuses, and disburses moneys against his client wishes, are those grounds for terminating his services and negotiate directly with the lien holders directly ??.. THERE IS VERY LITTLE MONEY LEFT.. The case did NOT generate anywhere near the amounts predicted by the lawyer...

+ Read More

Attorney answers 3

Best Answer

Lien negotiation is not required under the terms of most contingency fee agreements. However, most lawyers provide that service as part of their services in order to settle the case. Attorneys also frequently take a “hair cut” to make a settlement work. Obviously, if the client will receive very little or perhaps even owe money after a settlement, few clients would agree to settle.

Not all cases are winnable or will put money in a client’s pocket after all liens are satisfied. However, not owing money is a benefit of lien satisfaction.

If an attorney has already negotiated the liens downward to a reasonable amount and the client agreed to the settlement knowing the negotiated amounts, it would not be proper for the client to insist on further negotiation, nor would it be grounds to terminate an attorney’s services without payment of the agreed contingency fee assuming it is reasonable.

A client can always discharge an attorney. The attorney will simply notice and file a lien. A client is ill equipped to negotiate medical or other liens downward. An attorney has leverage -- an unrepresented client does not.

You may wish to review this blog post: Contingency Fee Recovery After Withdrawal or Discharge

I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice or counsel. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice and counsel must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice and counsel during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for advice and counsel. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference



hahahah .. You are right... some lawyers do need a "HAIR CUT" or most likely to go bold after settling a cse wherein they represented a higher settlement amount to a client, just to actually get a fraction of that imaginary amount... I LKE YOUR ANSWER THOUGH..


Lien negotiation is usually provided, but not mandatory unless it is included in the retainer agreement. The attorney is obligated to honor liens that he knows about, but should not disburse funds unless you agree. If there is a dispute, the attorney should keep the money in his trust account to let you try and work it out, or deposit the dispute money with the court and let you battle it out with the providers.


If the client has already agreed to a settlement, then it may be too late for the client to refuse to sign settlement documents because the defense might file a successful motion to enforce settlement.

Before the client accepts the offer, the lawyer should have negotiated lien reductions using as his or her threat to get the lien reductions the fact that the client won't agree to the settlement unless the liens are reduced.

Clients want to know what they will net out of a settlement, not the dollar amount before deductions. Lawyer and client should have a clear understanding of what the client will net before a settlement is agreed to.