I do not at first blush see any problems here, at least not with respect to question 1.
Question 2, I would tread lightly, as that would appear at first blush to be potential direct copyright infringement.
Hope this helps.
Matthew A. Pek
Attention: This e-mail originates from the law firm of CARTER PEK, P.C. ("The Firm"). All information appearing herein is protected and regarded as confidential, and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s) indicated above. Be advised that if the reader of this message is not in fact the intended recipient, notice is hereby given that any dissemination, distribution and/or copying of this message is strictly prohibited and punishable by law. If you have received this message in error, kindly reply to sender forthwith, and destroy and purge any and all copies of such message, whether in paper, digital or other media format. If you are not an existing client of The Firm, do not construe anything in this message to cause you to become a client of The Firm, unless it contains a specific statement to that effect, and refrain from disclosing any sensitive information in which you have an expectation of privacy and/or confidence if sending a reply. contains a specific statement to that effect, and be careful not to disclose any sensitive information in reply that you expect to hold in confidence. If you are the intended recipient hereof and are a client, co-counsel or retained expert of The Firm, be mindful to maintain its contents in strict confidence in order to preserve any and all privileges, including the attorney-client and/or work product privileges that may apply. Thank you. IRC 230 Disclosure: In accordance with Internal Revenue Code 230, The Firm hereby advises you that, unless otherwise expressly stated, any reference made to or discussion of a federal tax issue contained in this message, or in any attachment(s) hereto, are neither intended nor permitted to be used for purposes of avoiding federal tax penalties.
Capturing and publishing a screen shot from a video appearing on another site may be treated differently than merely linking to third party material. There are numerous complex copyright issues generated by your question, such as fair use and vicarious liability, so you should have your business model thoroughly vetted by an experienced intellectual property lawyer familiar with DMCA safe harbor issues. Depending on how you structure your business, you may have protection from copyright infringement claims under the DMCA, in the same ways that YouTube and Google are generally not liable for linking to potentially infringing works. But the law relating to secondary / vicarious copyright infringement is developing rapidly, and there are legal requirements imposed on service providers who desire to take advantage of the protections afforded by federal law.
Disclaimer: The foregoing does not constitute legal advice or form an attorney/client relationship. Please contact an attorney for formal legal advice on any specific matter.
You got two very complicated answers because this is not an easy issue.
First of all, the copyright is owned by others. Therefore, you will need a lawyer to explain what you can and cannot do with their pictures without creating liability for yourself.
Simply linking to where you got the photos or videos does not relieve you of liability for copyright infringement.
This post is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice specific to you. This general information is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney in your jurisdiction. The attorney client relationship is not established by this post.