pensions accrued during the marriage are community property. Upon divorce, each spouse has a claim to an equitable share of the pension from date of marriage or maybe earlier to date of separation.
compensation for the lifetime injury is trickier. Normally, the court will reason that the personal suffering of the spouse is the separate property of the spouse. However, the portion of the pain and suffering payment that is replacing money the spouuse would have earned by going to work is prob. community and you would probably be entitled to your community share of that portion up until the day of seperation. after that, you probably wouldn't be entitled to any of it.
also, the court could give you some of your spouse's separate property if it felt that was equitable.
How much of an interest you may have cannot be answered based on your brief post. You likely should consult with an attorney who can review your facts and give you an informed opinion.
You may want to review the cases below to see whether they are applicable to your case.
Unpublished cases generally may not be cited as precedence. However, the cases cited within the unpublished case likely are still good law. From an unpublished case (IN RE MARRIAGE OF JAMESON, 21865-1-III (Wash.App. 4-29-2004)):
When disability benefits replace future compensation, for example postdissolution wages, the benefits are not distributable at a dissolution trial. This is because future compensation is not before the trial court at dissolution; thus, when disability benefits replace such compensation, these benefits are treated in the same fashion. In re Marriage of Perkins, 107 Wn. App. 313, 317, 26 P.3d 989 (2001) (citing In re Marriage of Brewer, 137 Wn.2d 756, 767-69, 976 P.2d 102 (1999)).
On the other hand, when disability benefits replace compensation earned but deferred during marriage, for example, retirement benefits, these benefits are distributable at a dissolution trial. Perkins, 107 Wn. App. at 317. `If . . . a party would be receiving retirement benefits but for a disability, so that disability benefits are effectively supplanting retirement benefits, the disability payments are a divisible asset to the extent they are replacing retirement benefits.' In re Marriage of Geigle, 83 Wn. App. 23, 31, 920 P.2d 251 (1996).
Sign up to receive a 10-part series of useful information and legal advice about the divorce process.