Disorderly conduct involves willfully hindering or obstructing the free passage of another in a public palce or on a public conveyance, willfully acting in a way that disturbs the peace or willfully failing to obey the lawful order of a police officer, or making unreasonably loud noise in a public place or on another's land. The scenario you describe does not seem to meet the definition of the offense and its hard to appreciate how your husband was charged by the police after the alleged event. You would be well advised to contact an attorney to investigate the matter and determine what information beyond what you presently know exists to support such a charge.
Mr. Eidelberg is licensed to practice law in Maryland and the District of Columbia. The response herein is not legal advice, does not create an attorney/client relationship, is for educational purposes, and intended to impart general information about the subject inquiry. Consultation with a qualified attorney in the state from which the inquiry is generated is strongly recommended so that case specific legal guidance can be obtained.
This does not sound like disorderly conduct. Your husband should go to court and fight the charge. The standard in a criminal case is beyond a reasonable doubt and I bet the State will drop the charge if those are the facts. He could get a lawyer or the Public Defender if he cannot afford private counsel. Good luck!
This answer is being given for general informational purposes only and is not protected by the attorney-client privilege since this is a public forum. The information provided does not create an attorney-client relationship. No communications with me on this forum shall be construed as arising out of an attorney-client relationship. If a client needs specific legal advice or opinions, he or she should retain counsel for advice or to undertake representation.
It sounds weak. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you evaluate the prosecution's case, any defenses that you might have, and any plea offer that might be made, so that you can decide whether to go to trial. Consider seeking a confidential consultation.
Information in the reply is provided as a public service. It is neither a comprehensive statement of the law nor legal advice, and no one should rely on it as such. If you have a legal problem or question, you should consult with an attorney, who can investigate the particular circumstances of your situation. Responding to a post does not constitute legal representation. I am not your lawyer, until we make an agreement and I receive my fee. Beware that posts and replies are not confidential. Anyone can read them.
It certainly doesn't sound like it, but I'd need to see the Statement of Charges and get more details.
Nothing posted by Mr. Cleckner on Avvo or in response to an Avvo question or request is intended to be considered legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. For actual legal advice, please contact an attorney for a (usually free) in-depth consultation where your entire situation can be evaluated.
If your version of events is accurate and believed by the judge, you husband would appear to have a strong defense, including, but not limited to, robust First Amendment rights to express himself. However, that may or may not be a big if. Therefore, your husband should retain a qualified criminal defense lawyer. All the best to him. Jon
None of my comments on AVVO's website constitute legal advice. It is only food for thought for possible matters to address with a qualified lawyer. The disclaimer page on my website hyperlinked herein applies to all my answers on AVVO.com .