I hired an attorney due to his five-star ratings and his experience. He never went to court for me. He sent 4 different people to court in his place. These 4 people never spoke with me, didn't know anything about my concerns and all they did was ask for a continuance. My case was never investigated, in the end they just wanted me to plead guilty and take a deal from the da. I don't think this is acceptable
Did you plead guilty or not? Why not speak to the attorney you actually hired??
San Diego County Criminal Defense. 20+ years experience. Put my experience to work for you!
You are not providing enough information to make an educated opinion and answer. Having other attorneys appear for your attorney is the kind of thing that does happen. Most criminal cases are resolved by plea and sentence bargains between the defense attorney and the prosecutor, so that is not unusual. And there is no way to know if any investigation took place when you were not present.
What you describe might be inappropriate conduct or it might be simply how most of those kinds of cases work. It is not out of the ordinary to send associates to handle simple hearings such as requests for continuance. Asking for a continuance is not necessarily a bad thing, i.e., not in your best interest. Often requesting a continuance is precisely the correct strategy, depending on the circumstances. Do not assume that asking for a continuance suggested anything contrary to your best interests without learning the reasons why those continuances were requested.
Similarly, advising you to plead guilty as part of a plea bargain might be an attorney simply disposing of your case in the easiest way, or it might be the absolute best strategy for you, depending on facts that no one here can know based on the little bit of information in your post. Only an attorney who can be allowed to know all of the facts and circumstances of your case could know.
When you say your case was not investigated, I would have to wonder what you know about what your attorney did.
Ultimately, if you have not entered into a deal, you still have the right to get another attorney to work with you. That attorney would be the one best suited to answer your question. If you have already pleaded out, you will have a very hard time proving the attorney committed malpractice.
Good luck to you.
This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed only through the mutual execution of an attorney-client agreement. The answer given is based on the extremely limited facts provided and the proper course of action might change significantly with the introduction of other facts. All who read this answer should not rely on the answer to govern their conduct. Please seek the advice of competent counsel after disclosing all facts to that attorney. This answer is intended for California residents only. The answering party is only licensed to practice in the State of California.
As my colleagues have opined, no one reading your post can advise you regarding your prior representation. The things you write about are not unusual nor do they tend to show negligence on the part of defense counsel.
The great majority of criminal cases are disposed of by plea (perhaps 95%). That is often the most beneficial result due to the uncertainties and expense of criminal proceedings.
You mention nothing about your case or why the plea, which you apparently accepted, was not in your best interests. To prove malpractice in a criminal case, you must prove actual innocence of all charges. Your time to do that was before your plea.
My answers are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers assume California law. I am licensed only in California. Do not rely on my answers. Legal advice must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship, nor does my answer or comment create a reasonable expectation that I am willing to discuss the possibility of forming an attorney-client relationship with anyone. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential. I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo because I have answered or commented on a question. Specifically, I assume no duty to respond to any question, comment, telephone call, or email. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take action, and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult an attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction for advice and counsel. See, also, Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.
Moving from ethics to criminal defense so as to enhance the chance that lawyers with experience in this area of law can respond. Not my area of law, but generally no special knowledge of your case is required for a simple appearance requesting a continuance and I believe that multiple continuances are fairly common in criminal matters.
Any answer provided on the AVVO website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice for your specific situation. You should always seek legal advice before taking any action which may affect your future rights. Your local legal aid office may well provide information or access to free legal advice and your state bar organization may provide referrals to reputable attorneys who will provide advice on a reduced cost basis.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.What determines Avvo Rating?Experience & background
Years licensed, work experience, educationLegal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awardsLegal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagementsDiscipline