If you were legally separated from your late husband, the court order would have severed your marital rights as his surviving spouse.
However, your two children are your late husband's legal heirs and take precedence over his mother who has no legal interest as long as your children survived their father.
If your late husband died in 2008, and he left no more than $100,000 in assets subject to probate (this does not include annuities, life insurance proceeds, etc.), you do NOT have to go through probate.
There is specific provision in the Probate Code for you to make a two-page DECLARATION UNDER PROBATE CODE SECTION 13100. This Declaration is sent to his mother and orders her to turn over to you as guardian of his heirs ALL the property that she is currently holding. If she has sold any of her son's property, she must turn over to you the proceeds of sale.
This Declaration can be prepared for you by a probate or estate planning attorney for you to sign as the guardian of your two children. You must "verify" the Declaration.
If you cannot afford an attorney but live anywhere near a California Superior Court (usually in the county "capital") there is usually an officer that can help people like you with preparing the Declaration.
If the mother does not respond, or refuses to turn over the property to you, she is in contempt of court. In that case, you will need to see a probate litigation attorney about that.
Rest assured, probate judges do not take lightly to cases like this.
There is no statute of limitation in this case. Certainly you ought to have taken action earlier but that does not excuse his mother from withholding property that belongs by law to your two children.
I hope this is helpful to you.
Mr. Grain is licensed to practice law throughout the state of CA with offices in Los Angeles/Beverly Hills and Pasadena, CA. His phone number is 877-858-4724 or his email address is email@example.com and his website is www.grainlaw.com. Legal disclaimer: LEGAL DISCLAIMER Mr. Fromm is ethically required to state that the response herein is not legal advice and does not create an attorney/ client relationship. Any response is only in the form of legal education and is intended to provide only general information about the matter within the question. Oftentimes the question does not include significant and important facts and timelines that if known could significantly change the reply or make such reply unsuitable. Mr. Grain strongly advises the questioner to confer with an attorney in their state in order to ensure proper advice is received. By using this site you understand and agree that there is no attorney client relationship or confidentiality between you and the attorney responding. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney that practices in the subject area in your jurisdiction, who is familiar with your specific facts and all of the circumstances and with whom you have an attorney client relationship. The law changes frequently and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The information and materials provided are general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance described in the question or omitted from the question. Circular 230 Disclaimer - Any information in this comment may not be used to eliminate or reduce penalties by the IRS or any other governmental agency.
This is a sad story, but unfortunately not all together uncommon. The short answer to your question as to whether there is a statute of limitations that governs when a probate can be opened, is NO. However, if a long time passes between the death and the opening of the probate, the judge is going to want to know why there such a delay.
However, I don't think that is the main issue here. As of January 1, 2012, an estate comprised of probate assets worth in excess of $150,000 is required to go through a formal, court-supervised probate. If the estate is worth less than that, an interested party can petition to administer the estate through the probate process if there are other compelling reasons to do so. In this case, although the probate court is probably the most appropriate forum in which to handle these issues, the dollar value of the assets probably makes it cost-prohibitive to open a probate for the sole purpose of sorting out the competing claims to your husband's personal and other property.
My answer to this question does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship.
You need to contact a probate atty to determine what type of matter needs to be filed to collectd these assets if they were in the man's name alone on his date of death.
Legal disclaimer: This answer does not constitute legal advice. I am admitted to practice law in the State of Missouri only, and make no attempt to opine on matters of law that are not relevant to Missouri. This answer is based on general principles of law that may or may not relate to your specific situation, and is for promotional purposes only. You should never rely on this answer alone and nothing in these communications creates an attorney-client relationship. less
Divorce Alternatives to divorce Legal separation and divorce Inheritance and divorce Car titles and loans in divorce Employment Estates Inheritance rights Estate assets Life insurance and estate planning Probate Probate assets Probate court Intestacy and probate Lawsuits and disputes Filing a lawsuit Vehicle title Marriage rights Court orders Contempt of court