I didn't read your whole 89 page lawsuit megilla there, but skimming it, I wondered what the conflict of interest is. If it's just that an "attorney for the child" finds himself in a lawsuit which seems to be a blunderbuss federal civil rights action against everyone official involved in some other unrelated family court case which has yet to go to trial or otherwise be disposed of, I don't see any conflict. Anyone can sue anybody for anything, and it doesn't mean the lawsuit has merit.
Unless you are the plaintiff or defendant in this lawsuit and the attorney for the child represents the someone else who is a in your family or a relative or has confidential information about your family situation as a result of his participation in the matter for which he is being sued, I see no conflict.
I'd also be very careful about impugning the reputation of a Law Guardian based on some unproven and potentially defamatory scuttlebutt that someone has put on the internet which might not be protected from libel even as a public document or litigation pleading. Unless there's some more direct connection of the GAL to your family, I wouldn't mention this in court, much less ask for a recusal or reassignment of GAL. It's only human nature for the GAL to dislike you for doing that, and having him dislike you won't be helpful, even though he's supposed to just focus on your child's wishes and welfare. It's human nature not to like people who are slandering or gossiping about you based on biased and possibly incorrect facts.
This answer is provided under the Avvo.com “Terms and Conditions of Use” (“ToU”), particularly ¶9 which states that any information provided is not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship between you and me or any other attorney. Such information is intended for general informational purposes only and should be used only as a starting point for addressing your legal issues. In particular, my answers and those of others are not a substitute for an in-person or telephone consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction about your specific legal issue, and you should not rely solely upon Legal Information you obtain from this website or other resources which may be linked to an answer for informational purposes. You understand that questions and answers or other postings to the Site are not confidential and are not subject to attorney-client privilege. The full Avvo ToU are set forth at http://www.avvo.com/support/terms . In addition, while similar legal principles often apply in many states, I am only licensed to practice in the State of New York and Federal Courts. Any general information I provide about non-New York laws should be checked with an attorney licensed to practice in your State. Lastly, New York State Court rules (22 NYCRR Part 1200, Rule 7.1) also require me to inform you that my answers and attorney profile posted on the Avvo.com site may be considered "attorney advertising" and that "prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome".
No. I briefly skimmed a few pages, but it seems like something that is likely to get thrown out. Like counsel noted, any one can sue anyone for anything, that doesnt make it true. Is everything your ex says about in this case true? Regardless, unless the AFC represented you or your ex or has some other connection to your family, you wont get him or her disqualified. The only thing you will probably do is anger them, and since their opinion is given substantial weight, that is not going to help your case, particularly if your children are young enough where the AFC can substitute judgment for them.
The fact that the same AFC is being sued in another court, doesn't create a conflict of interest. A person is always innocent until proven guilty so filing of a lawsuit doesn't create guilt. Also, it is not generally a good idea to object to any particular law guardian because it usually comes across as one party posturing for an advantage over the other person. The AFC is there to (presumably) represent the best interests of the child, not the interests of the parents and when one parent accuses the AFC of not looking out for the child's interest, it usually sounds as if you're really saying that the AFC is not supporting your position in the case. Ultimately, if you feel that the child's wishes are not truly being represented, either party can request a Lincoln Hearing where the Judge will speak to the child in his/her chambers with only the AFC present (not the parents). This allows the child to say what he/she really feels without the parents hearing. Also, keep in mind that sometimes children tell parents what they want to hear because they are afraid of hurting feelings.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.