Kansas's statute has more procedural safegaurds than the New York law seems to have. It is not applied so haphazardly, nor on every vehicle. However the argument that the cost varies is interesting as well as the point that there is no exception for those unable to pay. This is important as an interlock can be required before reissuing a license, even if you do not own a car. I am not aware of Kansas litigation to this point which has rasied the issue.