Skip to main content

Is it illegal to change song lyrics and alter tunes for a school production?

Cincinnati, OH |

Is it copyright infringement if song lyrics are completely changed, and the tune is also somewhat changed, for inclusion in a school play? No money will be charged for admission, and the original song and writer would be acknowledged in the program as " inspired by....". Is this considered parody?

+ Read More

Attorney answers 2


It might be considered parody, if it's actually parody, otherwise it's an infringement of the songwriter's exclusive copyright in the music and lyrics. Parody doesn't mean using someone else's work because you want to use an already well-known song to adapt to some new use -- a legal parody is one where the new lyrics actually parody the original work.

The facts that 1) you're not charging admission may affect the owner's damages, and that 2) your according "inspired by" credit, don't shield you from infringement if it's infringement.

Disclaimer: Please note that this answer does not constitute legal advice, and should not be relied on, since each state has different laws, each situation is fact specific, and it is impossible to evaluate a legal problem without a comprehensive consultation and review of all the facts and documents at issue. This answer does not create an attorney-client relationship.



As much as people would LIKE to think this is a protected use under the umbrella of "fair use", it actually isn't. It happens all the time, of course, but that doesn't mean it is protected. Please do not be fooled by wanting something to be true into believing that it is. This answer is absolutely the correct one under MOST circumstances. The important thing one needs to understand about the fair use of "parody" is that if you use the song itself, including just the music, then the song itself must be the target of the parody. For example, I once was involved wih a group that wanted to parody the song "Five Guys Named Moe." IF we had used the music of the song but the lyrics were about lobbyists in Washington, that woud NOT have been fair use. However, our version, F"Four Guys Named Lou" did actually parody the concept and lyrics of the song itself, so we were allowed not only to perform it, but even to record it and distribute it. Remember, commentary, mimicry, and criticism ARE protected speech, and they do NOT have to be funny to be considered parody under the copyright laws. Using someone else's work for your own purposes without permission, however, is NOT! Would you want your words changed and used for someone else's purposes if you wrote a song?


I start from the premise that, under the circumstances you describe, it would be lawful for you to perform the song just as it was written without any license or permission from, or any attribution to, the owner of the copyright in the song.

Copyright law expressly permits your non-licensed use of the song. See 17 USC 110 ("Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the following are not infringements of copyright: ... (4) performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work otherwise than in a transmission to the public, without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and without payment of any fee or other compensation for the performance to any of its performers, promoters, or organizers, if ... there is no direct or indirect admission charge ... .").

Because you can lawfully perform the song as written without a license, I think you have free rein to change its lyrics and perform the song as modified. There is no need to engage in any "fair use" analysis (which includes the inquiry that you're focused on -- that is, is your modified song a parody).

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer