Is it a violation of civil rights to adopt insurance premium structure that benefits families be imposed on single insurees?
Big Bear City, CA |
Can a vote of the majority (couples and families) to adopt supercomposite health insurance rates (average) be legally imposed on the minority (single people) This comes at an monthly out of pocket cost of $500 extra dollars for single people, and means a family of 7 pays the same premium as a family of 1?
Can the majority here (90 couples and families) really dictate this to the minority of singles (12 people). Just doesnt seem right.