You are asking for legal opinons which are beyond legal analysis.
Notarization, in and of itself does not make a document more "legal" (except with deeds etc) but only verifies the person signing was on satisfactory evidence who they said they were on a certain date.
Your agreement does appear to have contractual merit. I cannot comment on the family law aspect, and have not seen the written agreement, so there are numerous missing facts.
Finally, normally and not on your facts: two people who sign on an agreement or loan are "jointly and severally" (both of you liable for 100% with a right to demand equitable contribution from the other signer. The creditor does not have to sue each for 50 percent.
A local San Jose attorney is easily found below on the Avvo Find A Lawyer function, left column.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.Ask a similar question
Mr. Doland has it exactly right. Generally, a signed agreement would be binding, assuming the elements of a binding contact are present, offer, acceptance and consideration. I am not a family law lawyer, but I believe responsibility for this debt should be resolved in your divorce proceeding. However, that will not change the lender's right to sue either or both of you for 100% of what is owed, it will only effect one of you owes a contribution to the other in the event either of you pays more than your share to the lender.Ask a similar question
Assuming both you and your husband signed the documents for the personal loan, then you are both liable for it. However, that does not require the person who loaned the money to sue both of you. He can sue both of you, or just one of you -- and that one has the right to seek payment from the one not sued. The creditor can sue whoever s/he wants -- an agreement between you and your husband doesn't change who the creditor can sue, unless the creditor agrees to it and gets some type of consideration for that agreement.
Even if only your husband signed the loan, it may still be owed by both of you if it went into the "community" of your husband and you, but that depends on specific facts that weren't given here.
Notarizing a document provides extra evidence that the person signing is the who it is supposed to be. The fact of notarization does not change the obligation.
If you have a family law lawyer, you should discuss this with the family law lawyer, and if you do not have a family law lawyer, you should consider doing so here.
www.bayoaklaw.com. 510-208-5500. This answer does not create an attorney-client relationship. It is not legal advice, because it is only of a general nature. Please contact a lawyer qualified in your jurisdiction to discuss your situation in confidence, using your factual details. Avvo answers are only general legal responses. Item 9 of Avvo.com's Terms and Conditions are incorporated in this disclaimer as though it were printed here.Ask a similar question
Just because you and your ex notarized a document does not mean it will necessarily be binding and controlling. It certainly has no impact whatsoever as against your creditor. The court can decide if it’s fair and reasonable but as it stands now in of itself it’s not automatically legally binding.
This participating Attorney does not warrant any information provided, nor are we creating an Attorney-Client relationship by providing said information to you on this site. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute, offer, induce, promise, or contract of any kind. The content provided is presented as a courtesy to be used only for informational purposes and is not represented to be error free. The Law Offices of John N. Kitta makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to its answer to inquiries, and such representations and warranties are being expressly disclaimed. Given limited facts, we are attempting to share relevant information concerning this area of the law as a public service.Ask a similar question
Sign up to receive a 10-part series of useful information and legal advice about the divorce process.