I am sorry to hear what you experienced. Under Texas law, you are describing a claim for the failure of the physician to obtain your informed consent before performing with the procedure. The way these cases are analyzed is whether or not a reasonable person would have declined the procedure if there was a full disclosure of the risks. Based on what you have described, I believe it would be difficult for you to succeed in a case against this physician.
Medical malpractice cases are complex and I believe that clients are best served by contacting an experienced medical malpractice attorney. After all, results matter! You are welcome to contact me at 281-580-8800 or www.painterfirm.com. This Avvo comment does not create an attorney-client relationship and is for informational purposes only.
I do not think you'd have a viable medical negligence claim. The treatment for the ileus would have been the same even had you been seen earlier. That you weren't fully made aware of the risks with the misshapen uterus would not have really changed the outcome of your pregnancy. Had she told you that the fibroid removal had a slim risk of hemorrhage (which you unluckily had), you likely would be hard-pressed to prove that you would have told her not to remove it.
Also, I would point out that you are in Collin County, Texas. If this medical care occurred in that county (and not in Dallas County), then you'd likely face one of the most conservative jury pools that can be imagined. Why is that important? Juries in Collin County do not find for injured patients very often. It's a real tough venue.
You might give a ring to Maria Wormington in old downtown McKinney. She is a medical negligence attorney with a great deal of experience. Being located in Collin County, she'll be able to advise you better than anyone on avvo.
What you describe is what lawyers call an informed consent case. Informed consent in Texas is largely statutory. Pursuant to statutory authority, the Texas Medical Disclosure Panel promulgates two lists. List A is the list of procedures requiring "full disclosure of specific risks." List B is the list of procedures requiring no disclosure. Uterine fibroid removal is on List A. The risks required to be disclosed are:
(5) Removing fibroids (uterine myomectomy).
(A) Uncontrollable leakage of urine.
(B) Injury to bladder.
(D) Injury to the tube (ureter) between the kidney and the bladder.
(E) Injury to the bowel and/or intestinal obstruction.
As you can see, excessive bleeding is not on the list of risks. However, "obstruction of the bowel," which is the same thing as "ileus," is on the list. Therefore, if the informed consent form you signed warned of either "obstruction of the bowel" or "ileus," you have no potentially valid informed consent claim. Otherwise, you may have one. However, the written informed consent form you signed for the C-section may provide that you consented not only to the C-section, but also to any and all other procedures the surgeon deemed necessary or appropriate during the course of the surgery. You will need to consult a lawyer to analyze this issue for you.
Please take note that a signed informed consent form, no matter how correct and complete, is not a license for the surgeon to render negligent care. If the surgeon was either ill advised to remove the fibroid or was negligent in the technical performance of the myomectomy, you may have a potentially valid malpractice claim based on that negligent conduct.
As you can easily see, this is a complex area of the law. Also, these cases are very fact-specific. To find out whether or not a claim is worth pursuing, I suggest that you promptly consult a Plano or Dallas plaintiffs' lawyer who is certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. A link to the Board's website appears below.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.