Deferred Adjudication is not a finding of guilt, unless you violated the terms of your probation, and the Court adjudicated you guilty. If you successfully completed your probation, then you should not have a conviction.
Todd Steele's response to your question is for general information purposes only. Nothing in this response should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
So long as you successfully completed your deferred adjudication term, you are in the clear and can answer "no" to that question. As a side note, I would recommend consulting an attorney regarding a non-disclosure, which if granted will effectively seal most deferred adjudication offenses from the public's view.
The Law Office of Victor Ghaemmaghami, PLLC
P.O. Box 14045
Austin, TX 78761
Yes, you can answer no. No, it is not a conviction.
Macy Jaggers's answer to a legal question on Avvo does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Ms. Jaggers offers everyone a free consultation to discuss their case. Feel free to call her office at 214-365-9800 to make an appointment (phones are answered 24 hours) or visit her website at www.macyjaggers.com for more information about her services and recent victories.
Although for most purposes it is true that unless later adjudicated (and thus changed) to a final conviction, a Deferred Adjudication is not considered a conviction, there are a few exceptions. I would not expect this to be one of them, but it would be worth a quick bit of research on recent case law just to be sure.
This answer is intended to be taken as general information and not as specific legal advice. You should always consult a qualified attorney and make him familiar with all the relevant facts in order to get proper legal advice. Every case is different, and they must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
David N. Smith
812 W. 11th Street, Suite 201
Austin TX 78701
Deferred adjudication is a tricky concept. Normally when a defendant is charged with a crime, pleads guilty or no contest, and the attorney for the government reads the factual basis for the crime, the judge says "I find the defendant guilty." This means the defendant was adjudicated guilty and now has a brand new conviction to haunt him or her forever.
With deferred adjudication, that last part (where the judge says "I find the defendant guilty") does not happen right away. In fact, if the defendant jumps through all the hoops, that last part will never happen, and therefore the defendant will never have a conviction for that offense. So, I would say deferred adjudication requires a finding of guilt (in the judge's mind). However, because the judge did not officially say he or she finds the defendant guilty, there was no official finding of guilt and therefore no conviction.