We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
A judge that was assigned to a case that concluded. This judge is now assigned the case involving a dispute concerning attorneys liens with one of the parties concerning same case.
From what I have been told by an attorney I met casually, said he can not sit on this case because he sat on the case itself and that case is over. Massachusetts have rules against this.
Can someone tell me what rule he is speaking of?