Yes. Law enforcement does not need to see Sammy commit the offense. If there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to lead law enforcement to reasonably conclude that Sammy is the responsible person, a citation for an infraction can be issued to Sammy.
As you have correctly stated, the standards for a misdemeanor and felonies differs, especially as to felonies.
This is a common issue in the use of cell-phones, which you may have had in mind when framing this question. In the 2006 case of People v. Wells (2006) 38 Cal. 4th 1078, a CHP officer made a traffic stop of a suspected drunk-driver just north of Bakersfield. The officer claimed he had received a dispatch call telling him that there was a “possible intoxicated driver” on the freeway “weaving all over the roadway.”
The caller described the vehicle as a 1980’s model, blue van and said it was heading northbound on Route 99. An officer in the vicinity then intercepted the van and stopped it. The driver was Susan Wells.
The officer determined that Wells seemed to be under the influence, although he did not notice any problem with her driving. He then arrested her. An inventory search of her van revealed heroin and several syringes. Wells then tested positive for marijuana (THC), cocaine and opiates.
Wells was then prosecuted for DUI (non-alcohol) and several drug-related charges. She moved to suppress all evidence on the grounds that there was an illegal traffic stop because the officer did not witness any unsafe driving and therefore lacked a reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop. Indeed, the general rule is that a traffic stop must be based on a reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed. Wells argued there could be no exception.
Her motion to suppress was denied and then appealed all the way to the California Supreme Court, which also denied her appeal. The Supreme Court ruled that not all traffic stops, however, based on anonymous tips are proper.
Instead, and perhaps to limit abuse by the police, the Supreme Court said a traffic stop based on an anonymous tip is proper when:
1. The police officer concludes that the car to be stopped is the same car as reported. This must be based on a sufficient description of the car and its location;
2. The caller saw and described a violation of the law;
3. The caller describes a dangerous situation posed by the car (and driver); and
4. The caller’s reliability is good.
The California Supreme Court did not require that the caller provide a license plate number, although a federal court in the Eight District (California is in the Ninth District) did suggest this was necessary.
I hope this answers your question and helps you understand the issues better.
The answer could be yes and no. In certain circumstances yes, they could, and sometimes they cannot. Depending on the facts of the case. The way you explained it, it is really hard to tell. I believe an attorney can give you a better assessment if you call one and talk about the real case.
Sharon Paris Babakhan
The simple answer is yes. Officers can rely on reports of other persons in order to issue a citation for a misdemeanor or infraction. They do not have to personally witness the offense, but they do have to have some information from some real person in order to substantiate probable cause for the citation.
Attorney James R. Fox If you found this answer helpful, let me know by clicking the "Mark as Helpful" button at the bottom of this answer or select it as Best Answer. It’s easy and appreciated. This response is intended to be a general statement of law, should not be relied upon as legal advice, does not create an attorney/client relationship and does not create a right to continuing email exchanges.
DUI DUI arrest DUI appeal Federal DUI Marijuana DUI Criminal defense Misdemeanor crime Crimes against society Marijuana laws and criminal charges Probable cause and criminal defense Reasonable suspicion and criminal defense Criminal arrest Appealing a criminal conviction Federal crime Traffic tickets Traffic stops Appeals Federal court