The police can only view what is visible to the naked eye. Undoubtedly, this Affidavit for Search Warrant can be traversed and quashed. If what you are saying is factual, then absolutely you can fight this case.
Seth Weinstein, Esq.
Practicing throughout Southern California
This reply should NOT be considered a legal opinion of your case / inquiry. At this time I do not have sufficient factual/legal documentation to give a complete answer to your question and there may be more to the issues you raised then I have set out in my brief reply.
You will undoubtedly receive answers from some of the outstanding attorneys licensed in CA who participate here. I've jumped in to say the following. Although it certainly is not clear from what you have posted, it appears to me that you may not yet have counsel representing you. What you describe raises all kinds of questions in my mind about the validity of the search warrant, but it will require an experienced criminal attorney to develop those issues. I highly recommend that you reach out to one or more of the CA attorneys who respond to your question to arrange a private conversation about your situation. Most of the lawyers here offer free, if limited, consultations. Take advantage of that to talk with one or more. They can "get away with this" if you do not have a good attorney there to prevent them from getting away with it. Good luck.
In order to fully address your question, I would need to review the terms of the search warrant. It is unclear whether the warrant was civil or criminal. Civil inspection warrants by statute cannot be executed with forcible entry. If you objected to the entry (even with a warrant) a new warrant must be issued that allows for forcible entry.
In addition, civil inspection warrants require 24 hours notice to the property owner. You could have a Constitutional property rights or state statute violation.
clamp on the transformer (up the pole) or clamp/bypass around the meter?
Curt Harrington Patent & Tax Law Attorney Certified Tax Specialist by the California Board of Legal Specialization PATENTAX.COM This communication is general information and not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. This communication should not be relied upon as any type of legal advice. Please note that no attorney-client relationship exists between the sender and the recipient of this message in the absence of either (1) a signed fee contract and (2) remission of an agreed-upon retainer. Absent such an agreement and retainer, I am not engaged by you as an attorney, nor is any other member of my law firm.