I agree with Mr. Pedersen and Ms. McCall. There are, however, a few exceptions to when you can record confidential conversations. If you are recording them to obtain evidence that you reasonably believe demonstrates extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, or harassing telephone calls, you may be entitled to secretly record the conversation.
Do not, however, make that call yourself. The odds are that what you think involves extortion, kidnapping, etc., actually wouldn't qualify, so make sure to talk to an attorney before contemplating doing this.
In any event, keeping a log or telling them about the recording, as Mr. Pedersen and Ms. McCall suggest, are both good options. Good luck!
Craig T. Byrnes
Disclaimer: Please be aware that I am not offering legal advice, nor forming an attorney-client relationship with you. I am not representing you, nor doing anything to protect your legal rights. If you believe that you have suffered a legal wrong, take action before any statute or limitations expires, or your right to do so may be lost forever. Good luck in your legal matter.
Only with the consent of the propel who you are recording. In California it is against the law to secretly record the conversations of others without their consent.
You might benefit from consulting with an experienced employment law attorney and having them evaluate your case. The California Employment Lawyers Association maintains a list of employment law attorneys who represent employees against employers. Follow the link to: www.cela.org.
California Penal Code section 632 makes it a misdemeanor to audio record another in a conversation that they expect is confidential unless consent is given by that person. It is a crime and it also has other penalties. For instance, the person who is recorded can get a $5,000 civil penalty against you for every violation of the law. In addition, the statute makes inadmissible any recording made in violation of the law, except to prove it was made for purposes of enforcing the statute. In other words, you risk a money judgment AND you do not get to use the recording.
Do the next best thing. Keep a detailed journal of what is happening. As soon as the meetings are over, journal everything you can remember. Short of recording, that is your next best option.
Good luck to you.
This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed only through the mutual execution of an attorney-client agreement. The answer given is based on the extremely limited facts provided and the proper course of action might change significantly with the introduction of other facts. All who read this answer should not rely on the answer to govern their conduct. Please seek the advice of competent counsel after disclosing all facts to that attorney. This answer is intended for California residents only. The answering party is only licensed to practice in the State of California.
As the other responses indicate, no you can't record the conversations without consent. Keep detailed notes contemporaneous with the meetings. Also, their conduct sounds like it constitutes unlawful retaliation. You need to bring it to the attention of the agencies HR department, and you might want to consult with an employment law attorney if things continue... Best of luck to you...
THESE COMMENTS MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED LEGAL ADVICE. Comments made on websites such as Avvo.com are provided for information purposes only, and you should not base a decision to act or refrain from acting based upon this answer. The only way to determine how the law may apply to your particular situation is to consult with an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Answering this question does not create an attorney-client relationship or otherwise require further consultation. That relationship is established by the execution of a written agreement for legal services. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.
Please do not take this as legal advice, but this war story from my past cases might help you. Names and details radically changed to protect the attorney client privilege.
I know how frustrating is is to work for an agency breaking the law and yet having a difficult time proving the violations. You can not just let it go. However you do not want your career and life trampled on.
One a law enforcement officer came into my office years ago. The department had fired them over illegal conduct they engaged in with another officer. The department did not fire the other officer. Fire one, fire both for the same conduct. Right?
They came into my office with tons of evidence. Evidence that their supervisor, and other small time politicians, were cheating on their wives, that they protected family members selling drugs, misuse of public funds and other sordid allegations. None of the evidence had to do with the charges filed against them. I neither used or even looked at the evidence. Contrary to the popular belief, lawyers are not extortionists.
The story had a happy ending. I did not need to know any of the irrelevant illegal acts to resolve the case. The former law enforcement officer did have illegally tape record conversations or send any of their friends in with a wire to resolve the case.
Call an attorney skilled employment attorney knowledgeable concerning public employees before you start tape recording anything. It is a felony to illegally tape record conversations on certain government properties. Prisons are the first areas that come to mind. Illegal wiretapping concerns tape recording telephone calls. Then there always the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for those government employees who exceed their authority in down loading information for a government computer.
There are right and wrong ways of handling a case like this. Call a lawyer.
As a veteran of public agency employment, I make this suggestion for your situation: when you are "pulled into" one of these meetings, bring your recording device out very visible and say "no objections to recording this, right?" And turn it on without waiting for a response. Meeting will end promptly. You will not be prosecuted. Rinse; repeat.
No legal advice here. READ THIS BEFORE you contact me! My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. I give legal advice ONLY in the course of a formal attorney-client relationship set forth in a written document executed by the client and by me or a member of my firm. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. My law firm does not provide free consultations. Please do not call or write to me with a “few questions” that require me to analyze the specific facts of your history and your license application and prescribe for you how to get a State license. I can give advice, make recommendations and answer specific questions only after reviewing the evidence and documents applicable to a specific client and following a personal meeting in my office in which the relevant facts can be developed and analyzed. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic challenges to universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We take cases of wrongful termination or employment discrimination only if the claims involve peace officers, universities or colleges.