We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on _________, 2008, at ___ a.m. in Department ___ of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles located at _________, California 9, Defendant _________ will move the above-entitled court for an Order staying enforcement of the Judgment.
Good cause exists for making the application for two reasons, (1) Defendant has filed a meritorious appeal of the judgment for possession, (2) Defendant _________ has filed a civil action against Plaintiff____________. in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. _________, as well as, Defendants ______________________ challenging the legality of the non-judicial foreclosure by said Defendants. Additionally, Defendant _________ is prepared to pay a monthly rental value pending The Ex Parte Application will be based upon this Application, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Certification of Notice of Ex Parte Application, the Declaration of _________ and other and further oral and documentary evidence to be adduced at the hearing of this Application.
By _____________________________WHEN THE BANK TOOK BACK THE PROPERTY THEY HAD THEIR REO BROKER COME AND GIVE ME A LETTER STATING THEY WERE THE NEW OWNERS AND I HAD THREE OPTIONS EITHER RENT THE PROPERTY ,TAKE CASH FOR KEYS OR PURCHASE THE SAID PROPERTY. SO I MADE AN APPT WITH THE BROKER TO DO A PURCHASE AGREEMENT, I ALREADY HAD A PROOF OF FUNDS FROM A LENDER. BEFORE I COULD MEET W ITH HIM THE BANK FILED A NOTICE TO VACATE THE PROPERTY AND THEY LISTED IT AT A RIDICULOUS PRICE. THEN THEY FILED AN UNLAWFUL DETAINER. I'M REALLY THINKING IF THEY HAVE LEGAL TITLE TO THE PROPERTY. THIS LOAN WAS MADE BY DOWNEY SAVINGS AND WE NO WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM. PLUS THEY DON'T HAVE A TITLE POLICY ONLY A COUNTY RECORDING THAT SAYS THEY DO.ANYBODY CAN RECORD A DOCUMENT. THERE'S SUSPICITIOUS QUESTIONS HERE.