I recently handed in a motion to the court ( civil matter, mental health) to strike the record of false testimony, perjury and false documentation. I did this by submitting a five page motion which consisted of evidence taken straight from the verified petition and medical records ( completely objective) showing the contradictions and lies, then added 32 pages of supplemental documentation which proved what motion stated. The judge denied it on a technicality which was I didn't submit a date for the other party to respond to and with no merit, but in the motion alludes to even if there was merit the decision was made and I was already held involuntary so there is no reason to revisit the veracity of the doctors testimony. Really? This doctor had me forcibly medicated based upon false info.