The NY Court of Appeals, although the highest court in the state, is not a statutorial exception to CPL 160.50(1)(d). Also, it's not a law enforcement agency so DCJS should not let it know that a sealed records exists for it to make an ex parte motion to unseal the record.
People v. Ellis, 184 A.D.2d 307 (1st Dept. 1992): people who only have 160.50 records may deny under oath the existence of the record.
CPL 160.60: "no one shall be required to divulge information pertaining..."
Executive Law 296.16: the state and any subdivision thereof may not inquire about arrests then not pending that did not result in a conviction.
Judiciary Law 53 says that the bar's rules may not be inconsistent with other statutes.
However, law schools and the bar ask for all arrests. Can I say no?