I agree with my colleagues. I think the best thing to do is contact the attorney that represented the client in the plea agreement. They should then reach out to the Commonwealth's attorney to have a discussion about reducing the sentence. That's because the sentence was reached by way of a plea, and to just file a motion to reduce sentence would (at least in my mind) likely be seen as going back on the agreement.
If there are some compelling reasons why the sentence should be reduced, I'd be pushing the CA on those and try to get it agreed to. Without an agreement, I think it's going to be difficult to get a judge to move.
I think it's great your friend did all of these things he wasn't required to. And getting a probation officer on his side is a great step too. But the best thing is to get the CA to agree to it.
Hope this helps.
This answer does not create a attorney/client relationship, but is intended solely in the court of discussion. It is always my recommendation to retain an attorney whenever a court appearance is necessary. This recommendation is highlighted when it relates to an individual's criminal record.
I am certain that the judge accepting a plea from that defendant made sure the defendant was properly legally represented by either a private or appointed counsel to accept a free and voluntary plea which content was explained by that attorney. That being said, the best legal route would be to contact the attorney of record to draft such Motion on all concomitant merits for the court to consider or retain a new local private counsel to initiate that legal procedure.
DISCLAIMER The answer given above by the lawyer serves for educational purposes only and provides general information and a basic understanding of the applicable law. Take notice that the answer above does not create an attorney-client relationship as this website is not intended to provide anyone a specific legal advice. Anyone using the site expressly consents that there is no attorney client privilege between any person and any attorney responding. Further take notice that the site should not be used as a crude substitute for any professional and competent legal advice by a licensed professional attorney in the applicable jurisdiction. The attorney above attempted to provide competent professional opinion, however, the law and its applications may change frequently and vary greatly from other U.S. jurisdictions and locales. Therefore, any information and opinions stated above are general in nature, and may not apply to specific factual or legal circumstances related to one's current legal issues. Contact an experienced lawyer admitted to practice in your State under an attorney-client privilege to further receive a comprehensive legal before making an educated decision about your particular legal issue. If you have further inquiries you may contact: Attorney Alexander Ivakhnenko 1021 West Adams, 102, Chicago, Illinois 60607 773-562-8602 http://alexanderivakhnenko.com
I am not admitted in Virginia. As a general rule, though, it is entirely in the sentencing judge's discretion whether to reduce a sentence. Your friend should contact his former attorney and proceed accordingly. If this case were in New York, I'd say the reduction was a long shot, because the defendant got the bargain that was promised.
I am not your attorney and any posts/messages or responses to posts/messages can not and do not establish an attorney-client relationship. You should not rely upon free legal advice, and I disclaim any liability for the outcome if you do. Any opinions offered on matters outside New York State are for general informational purposes only.
I concur with the others. Seeking a sentence mofification unilaterally is like reneging on the bargain. Because a copy of the motion must be sent to the CWA, it is likely that he or she would write a response to remind the sentencing judge about the plea. Therefore, absent some compelling reason, I think the judge would not grant the motion . As the others have suggested, if your friend has done something extraordinary that may warrant a second look at the sentence or even a modifcation of how it is to be served without an actual reduction, the CWA may go along with it. Absent that, I think he has no chance. The best thing to do is to have his attorney contact the CWA and discuss it before filing anything. Only if the CWA is on board should the attorney file.
I concur with the other attorney's. Your friend should reach out to the attorney of record and ask that he/she reach out to the Commonwealth. I would recommend filing a motion to reconsider through an attorney and not on his own.