It depends on your policy, but usually the insurance company wants to settle but the doctor won't give his consent.
In seeking an attorney on this site, beware of limiting your search to attorneys with a 10 rating, and carefully read the AVVO disclaimer regarding their rating system. There are certain factors that are given great weight which do not necessarily have any bearing on an attorney's experience, abilities, and results with certain types of cases. Accordingly, the rating numbers can be misleading. Also beware of basing your choice on the fee charged, as a low fee, depending on the skill, experience and determination of the specific attorney handling your case, could actually have an inverse relationship to the amount actually put in your pocket.
That's a very good question. It all depends on the policy. Many medical malpractice insurance policies have "consent" clauses which don't allow the insurance company to settle without your consent. You are asking about the opposite scenario. If you truly want to resolve the claim within your insurance proceeds and the carrier isn't agreeing, I recommend hiring personal counsel to protect you in the event a judgment is taken against you in excess of your insurance limits. Another way to make the insurance company resolve the case is to admit that you're responsible and your negligence caused the alleged harm.
You should have an independent attorney review your insurance policy. The insurance company will settle for an unreasonable amount even if you instruct it to do so. The consent for settlement in a medical malpractice case is usually withheld by the physician. However, if you want to settle within your policy limits, you should instruct your insurance company and the lawyer that was hired to defend you, to settle the case within your policy limits. You may also want retain independent counsel to ensure that your are not exposed to any excess judgements outside the scope of your insurance policy.
Notwithstanding your desire to see the claim settled, your insurer may view the claim as a defensible one that they'd rather take to trial then settle. Danirl Horowitz' suggestion that you retain personal counsel to review the policy and oversee settlement discussions is a good idea.
Disclaimer: answers posted by attorney Daragh Carter to questions posted on AVVO are NOT privileged or confidential and will not and should not be construed to create an attorney-client relationship between attorney Daragh Carter and you or anyone else.
You have been given excellent advise on here.
You should hire your own counsel and discuss this with them. They can advise you on the best course of action. The most important thing is to protect yourself in case the insurance company refuses to settle and the eventual judgment exceeds the policy limits.
Insurers do have a lot of leeway in handling claims. However, there is a caveat. Do a Google search for "Stowers Doctrine." That's the doctrine in Texas that protects insureds from the unbridled discretion of insurance companies.
I hope this information answers your question. If you need more information, simply add a comment or call me. Good luck!
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.