If Federally, i require no ID, then how can the state demand that i submit one to a police officer when asked? Is an ommision of a law to have something, in effect, a legal defense against striking down a state law that demands i have it. Couldnt it be argued, that the Federal System has no many laws, that by this point, if it doesnt have a law on something, the opposite is a law. If i dont require an ID federally, then i have the RIGHT to not own one, in which then i would have the right to not show a police officer on a state level because i am not required to have one to begin with.
I know it is a stretch, but i think it could be argued.