Chances are your attorney is making sure all possible avenues of liability coverage are explored. It is unethical for attorneys to file lawsuits without just cause, so he isn't doing this just to squeeze money out of a party that couldn't arguably be liable in some way. That being said, the decision to sue is ultimately yours and yours alone. Talk to your attorney about why he is recommending this, and whether the possible benefits outweigh the hassle of the process, or not.
This is general advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
You should be guided by your current attorney's advice. If he/she thinks that they have liability and is willing to pursue the case, what's the down side to you? You should discuss this and your concerns with your attorney.
I would follow your lawyer's recommendation. He or she knows all of the facts, and if you have confidence in his or her abilities, follow the advice you have been given,
There is certainly a chance. It depends on the facts of the accident which are not posted here and given that the matter is in litigation, it's probably not wise to post any further information. Your attorney is in the best position to evaluate both the liability and damages situation. Ultimately, the decision is yours to settle a case or not howver you may be selling yourself short. Sit down with your lawyer and discuss your concerns and what he/she realistically hopes toachieve by pursuing the double parked car.
Disclaimer- The information you obtain at our web-site or through postings on such sites as this is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for specific advice regarding your individual situation. Any response given here is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response may change appropriately.
Don't try to second guess your attorney. If you do not understand what is going on, simply ask your attorney to get together and discuss why he/she is handling your claim the way he/she is. There should be a good reason your case is being handled the way it is. Best of luck.
Mr. Crosner is licensed to practice law in California and has been practicing law in California since 1978. The response herein is general legal and business analysis.. It is not intended nor construed to be "legal advice" but rather it is analysis, and different lawyers may analyze this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. Oftentimes the question does not include significant and important facts and timelines that, if known, could significantly change the reply and make it unsuitable. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.
There is a chance that you could collect from the parked car if it can be shown that there is liability on said car for the accident. You did not provide enough information to decide this factor one way or the other. IF the parked car was parked at night without the hazard flashers on there may be an argument.
Follow the advice of your Attorney.
THANK YOU KEN LITMAN, ESQ. 64 SHORT WAY ROSLYN HEIGHTS, NY 11577 DIRECT # 516 359-6333 KENLITMAN@AOL.COM FAX # 516 908-4194 www.seriousinjury.tv
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.