It's only good as a warning to her. You can hope that the court next time will remember that she was given one more chance to mend her errant ways.
Other than that, this is why staying out of court is prudent. Even experienced attorneys can't guarantee what a judge will do.
If this answer is helpful or the best answer, please say so. This is for general information purposes only, and not as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Legal disclaimer: In accordance with the Avvo community guidelines, this communication does not constitute "legal advice", nor does it form an attorney-client relationship. No information disclosed in these questions and opinions will prohibit this lawyer from representing a different client in the matter.
Did you immediately file a Motion for Revision? Do it ASAP, because you usually only have 10 days from the order. This motion lets a Judge review the Commissioner's decision. Sometimes you actually win. These are complicated questions. You should immediately consult with an experienced family law attorney. See my AVVO Legal Guides on contempt and motions to revise for more information about the legal issues raised by your inquiry. To find my Legal Guides, go the AVVO website at www.AVVO.com; click on “Find a Lawyer”; get to my AVVO home page by clicking on my name or photo; when you get to my AVVO home page scroll down to "Contributions" and then click "Legal Guides." You will get a list of the 29 Legal Guides I have published on AVVO. Scroll down this list and select the topics that are relevant to your question. You may also want to schedule a free ½ hour consultation with me by calling my office at 253-815-8440.
This AVVO Answer is provided for general educational purposes only. By using or participating in this site you agree and understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the attorney responding, and no attorney-client confidentiality. The law changes frequently, and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The information provided in this Answer is general in nature and may not apply to the factual circumstances described in your question. The applicable law and the appropriate answer may be different in the State or States where the relevant facts occurred. For a definitive answer you should seek legal advice from an attorney who (1) is licensed to practice in the state which has jurisdiction; (2) has experience in the area of law you are asking about, and (3) has been retained as your attorney for representation or consultation. Your question and the attorney’s answer may be used for promotional or educational purposes
The harsh reality is that contempt is a very ineffective and unwieldy remedy for the kinds of disputes that occur in family court. It is a blunderbuss of a penalty that, because it is quasi-criminal in nature, carries all sorts of legal protections and limitations in favor of the alleged contemnor. These special issues are distractions to the nature of the case -- ie., marital dissolution and allocation of assets and custody. Contempt proceedings draw on issues in which both legal counsel and the court are almost always markedly under-equipped. Experienced family law judges will admit (privately) that the family law system should be reformed so that family law courts have a more effective array of remedies, reserving contempt only for truly major, singular, and egregious acts such as absconding with children.
It is particularly ineffective to have contempt as the potential remedy in a legal field that is so vastly populated by persons representing themselves. The harsh reality is that even a big proportion of the family law bar does not truly know how to successfully prosecute -- or defend -- a contempt action, and virtually no one representing themselves can do it correctly to a standard that will survive appellate review.
In a high-asset marital case, contempt , if utilized at all, is handled by special and limited contempt counsel, an attorney who will not be responsible for all of the rest of the less adversarial processes of the case including on-going interactions with the court and opposing counsel. Most often contempt counsel is a former prosecutor or public defender (high-volume criminal practice being one of the few legal areas where substantial contempt experience can be acquired). Where these kinds of efforts and resources cannot be utilized, the marital case and its individual and issue-specific disputes should be handled some other way by resort to some other remedy. Contempt is useless and ineffective in typical family law circumstances, especially if it is wielded by pr se litigants, and even if the court is somehow persuaded to make the finding.
My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice. I give legal advice only in the course of an attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by individual consultation and execution of a written agreement for legal services.