That's much easier to read.
The terms of your oral contract control and it doesn't matter, although oral contracts are harder to prove than written ones, that you didn't bother putting anything in writing.
If the car and mobile home belong to him, so do those vehicles' debts for implounding and storage, and you have to honor your part of the deal to put them in his name "once he finds a way to do so," whatever that means. If your oral contract didn't address his incarceration and your continuing duty to keep these vehicles in your name, a court would impute a duty to act reasonably and in accordance with the parties' intent. If that's vague, that's the result of not having a written contract that spells out the parties' respective rights and obligations.
Avvo doesn't pay us for these responses, and I'm not your lawyer just because I answer this question or respond to any follow-up comments. If you want to hire me, please contact me. Otherwise, please don't expect a further response. We need an actual written agreement to form an attorney-client relationship. I'm only licensed in CA and you shouldn't rely on this answer, since each state has different laws, each situation is fact specific, and it's impossible to evaluate a legal problem without a comprehensive consultation and review of all the facts and documents at issue.