The reps oral agreement overrode what the contract said and the rep was found in court to have a fiduciary duty to me by operation of law. During trial I said I understood the contract. It wasn't until yesterday, I found out that the contract reads that the company I invested with has the right to use my money and place opposite sales (long or short) in the futures market. I misunderstood this statement. I thought this meant a different market entirely, however I have since learned that the advise my rep gave me was opposite of what the company was investing my money in. hence, I went bankrupt in 6 months. I have an oral argument scheduled may 23. Can I bring this up the the panel of judges?