You should consult with an attorney to review your non compete agreement (which often times are not enforceable in California) and the circumstances surrounding your new business (use of prior employer's trade secrets). Many attorneys will offer a free consultation for one hour. If the communication you received was simply a letter, email is fine and there is no requirement that they serve you via priority mail. If the communication you received was actually a summons or complaint, a more formal means of service beyond email is required. Good luck.
Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between you and Jeffrey Lewis. If you have a legal question, you should contact an attorney and seek legal advice based on your specific circumstances. Do not take any actions or refrain from acting based on any information contained in this website. Jeffrey Lewis disclaims any liability or responsibility for any actions taken or not taken in reliance on this website.
Definitely consult with an attorney. An attorney may be able to stop this pretty fast because, as the other lawyer pointed out, noncompete agreements are often unenforcebable in California. But whether the noncompete can be enforced against you, and whether you've done anything that could constitute theft of trade secrets, is something a lawyer can help you figure out.
I am licensed only in California and this response is provided as general information only. It is not intended to be legal advice. Legal advice must be based on the specific facts of the particular situation, and by necessity this forum is not appropriate for discussion of specific facts. Contact a lawyer for legal advice. My answer to your question on AVVO does not create an attorney-client relationship.
You are not required to respond to an email or a telephone call. However, if you fail to address this situation you may end up being sued. And if you are served with a lawsuit you will be required to respond.
Your best bet is to contact an attorney immediately and seek advice regarding how this matter may be resolved. If litigation can be avoided, total legal costs may be significantly less than if a lawsuit is filed. While you have no legal obligation to respond to the email, it may be in your best business interests to seek a resolution immediately.
You should speak with an attorney as soon as you can about this. Have him/her review your non compete agreement, because those are often times not enforceable in California. Whether yours is will depend upon your particular situation. As far as responding to the e-mail, you have obligation to respond but you might want to do so to try and resolve the situation. Before you do, however, I would speak with an attorney first to figure out where you stand. If it's feasible, you should also engage an attorney to negotiate on your behalf as well. Most attorneys (including my office) will provide you with a free initial consultation to give you a general idea as to what your options are. However you proceed, I wish you the best of luck!
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyze this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.
I agree you need to consult with an attorney so you fully understand your legal right to compete with your prior employer and the difference between fair competition and unfair competition, especially when trade secrets are involved. An attorney drafted letter, under the right set of facts, may cause your previous employer to think three times before instituting such litigation against you. -- Michael
SINCE 1974. My answers are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers assume California law. I am licensed in California, only. Answers must not be relied upon.<br> <br> Legal advice and counsel must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice and counsel during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us.<br> <br> The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential. I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo because I have answered or commented on a question. Specifically, I assume no duty to respond to any question, comment, telephone call, or email because of my participation.<br> <br> All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult an attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction for advice and counsel. See, also, Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.<br>
In addition to other answers, they are not reqd to use a particular means of communication. Email is fine. They will have to serve you properly with a lawsuit if it goes that far.
Short answer: if you choose to respond, have an attorney do it. Whatever you say as the defendant will be used against you in court, so the wisest course of action is usually to say nothing at all and let counsel deal with it.