Are you saying that the transcript does not accurately relect the testimony, or that the transcript does accurately relect the testimony but the testimony was not true?
Either way may be pretty much out of luck. If your recollection of the testimony is different from the transcript then your remedy was a hearing before the judge to correct the transcript. Such a request seldom succeeds. Maybe if the judge's notes and all of the attorney's notes disagreed with the transcript then some part of it might be changed. Otherwise, the judge is going to go with the transcript.
And if the transcript is correct but it is the testimony itself that you dispute, then you are stuck with the factual determinations of the trial court.
At some point a decision becomes final and it stands. It might have been, in a sense, wrong. But that is just too bad. It's over. Sounds like you are at about that point.
Not sure what kind of case you had but it sounds like a civil action. This question went out as, among others, criminal defense. I'd like to reclassify it, but would need to know what the case was about.
Contributions on AVVO.com in no way create an attorney-client relationship nor are they intended to be relied upon as a course of action without having first consulted directly with an attorney, where the specific facts and circumstances of your case can be fully discussed.
I know that you were not surprised by this result because you had been advised multiple times in advance, here on Avvo, that this was the inevitable outcome of your efforts to revise the record of proceedings. Testimonial (written or oral) contradictions to what has been certified by the reporter will virtually never suffice for this purpose, else there could be no standards or consistent and predictable results. If it were that feasible to change a trial record at will, at least one side would inevitably challenge the record in in every dispute in order to create rights or advantages on appeal. So, the truth is, you never had a chance in this effort. And you knew that.
It is probably not possible for you to accept this advice, any more than you could persuade yourself to accept the prior cautions but, as a practical matter, you are at the end of this effort. There are no procedures remaining that have any realistic prospect for success for you in revising the record of proceedings. At this point, what can yet be meaningful and useful for you is a consultation with a skilled appellate attorney to determine whether you have any good reason for investing your time, effort, funds and heart in any further legal (appellate) processes.
I know you have suffered significant and crushing losses. But at some point you need to not chase your losses with further investments of resources if there is no reasonable expectation of success. Consult with a skilled specialist who can give you a solid and reliable analysis.
My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice. I give legal advice only in the course of an attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by individual consultation and execution of a written agreement for legal services.
You seem to be saying the defendants submitted a reporter's transcript of the proceedings. A transcript is always the preferred record of oral proceedings. Now, if there is reason to believe the transcript contains errors you can file a motion to correct the transcript in teh appeal court after the record is filed. The problem is: You need an affidavit from the trial judge that there were errors by the reporter and an affidavit from the reporter admitting these errors would help.
But, you should recognize that your memory of the exact words said at this trial may not be very good. Reviewing a transcript of proceedings in which I appeared, I often find I don't remember saying things exactly as they are in the transcript but there is generally no reason to doubt that the reporter accurately took the words down and accurately transcribed them.
Cal. Bar No. 104800
Wis. Bar No. 1020123
Member: U.S. Supreme Court Bar
Every party in a suit, after the fact, would like to change the record to enhance the likelihood of prevailing at appeal.
Recommend you meet with an attorney who specializes in appeals. Had you done so earlier, that attorney would have told you why the affidavit you tried to introduce was never going to be considered by the judge. Perhaps a consultation will allow you to narrow down your focus of effort on what you CAN do that may improve your success downstream.
READ THIS BEFORE CALLING OR EMAILING ME: I am licensed to practice before the state and federal courts in Virginia. We have not established an attorney-client relationship unless we have a signed representation agreement and you have paid me. I give a 100% effort to get you on the right track with your issue. Sometimes that means legal educational information, sometimes that means counseling and non-legal guidance. You should speak with an attorney to whom you have provided all the facts, before you take steps that may impact your legal rights. I am not obligated to answer subsequent emails or phone calls unless you have hired me. I wish you the best of luck with your situation.