Nothing. The Chapter 11 bankruptcy discharged the debt, but would not have removed the tax lien. if the IRS recorded a tax lien on your property before you filed for bankruptcy, the lien will remain on the property. Therefore, when you refinanced the loan, the IRS was entitled to be paid.
While property dealt with by the plan may be stripped of the tax lien pursuant to 11 USC § 1141(c), individual debtors often have prepetition property which is excluded from their bankruptcy estates (such as ERISA qualified pension interests, as in Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (1992)); exempted from their bankruptcy estates (see 11 USC § 522, Bankruptcy Rule 4003, and Taylor v. Freeland, 503 U.S. 638 (1992)); or abandoned by their bankruptcy estates prior to plan confirmation (11 USC §§ 554(a)-(b)).
An individual debtor’s non-estate property of this type is not generally dealt with by a Chapter 11 plan, so this property is not ordinarily stripped of prepetition tax liens by the plan. See 11 USC § 1141(c); In re Isom, 901 F.2d 744 (9th Cir. 1990). So, while exemptions may have protected the equity in your home from general creditors, they did not affect the IRS.
One thing worth noting is that IRS tax liens are subject to lien stripping on debtor's residence in Chapter 11 just like any other lien. The Bankruptcy Court in Johnson v. IRS, Bktcy Ct PA, 101 AFTR 2d 2008-1798, held the IRS lien against Chapter 11 debtor's residence was null and void pursuant to 11 USC 506 because other priority liens pre-dating the IRS lien collectively exceeded residence's fair market value (FMV), so there was no equity in residence to which IRS lien could attach. You don't really say if this is your residence, but it seems implied.
Not really enough information in the post to know how you dealt with the issue in the Plan. This can be complex stuff. I suggest you simply contact your prior attorney and ask how this is possible. Doubtless this is from a misunderstanding of how the Plan would address the IRS debts in full. I am sure he/she can explain what happened. If on the off-chance the IRS did something they should not have, then you really need to have him/her layout your options.
Had this been a Chapter 7, there would be even less to mull over. The IRS lien cannot be stripped in the 7 and would survive the discharge as stated by my colleague.
Best of Luck.
The posting attorney is admitted to the U.S. Tax Court and authorized to represent clients in all 50 states before the IRS. Outside of IRS matters, the posting attorney is licensed to practice law generally in the State of Texas and no other state. The information provided in this post is for general educational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice by any party. No attorney-client relationship is formed with any party by the mere posting (or reading) of this information on the AVVO website. Circular 230 Disclaimer - Advice given in this response cannot be used to eliminate penalties with the IRS or any other governmental agency
Chapter 11 proceedings are very complex. I am sure you were represented by an attorney and probably one that is very proficient in the bankruptcy laws. Did you go back to your attorney and ask him to explain?
Normally, if the IRS has placed a lien on a property, it would be subject to it being "stripped". The fact that you may have obtained a discharge personally from the taxes, does not automatically wipe out or strip the lien from the property. Therefor, when you sell or refinance, if you have equity, the IRS will help themselves to satisfy the lien. If your property was "under water" at the time you filed the chapter 11, the lien could have been stripped. If you had equity, it could not.
Without more facts, it would be difficult to tell you exactly what happened and why, but I believe my response and that of the other attorneys could give you some ideas.
"We are attorneys acting as a federally designated Debt Relief Agency. We counsel and assist our clients in filing bankruptcy under the US Bankruptcy Code." CONSUMER BEWARE: Until you have retained this office, no attorney-client relationship exists between Sariol Legal Center (SLC), Frank R. Sariol, or any attorney employed by SLC, and yourself. Therefore anything that is stated in an email to you (irrespective of who initiated that email) cannot be relied upon as a legal advice upon which you should act. If you have contacted this office regarding a civil claim, be on NOTICE that every civil claim has certain time restrictions applicable to it and if you do not act within that time frame your right to proceed may be lost FOREVER. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Any legal advice expressed in this message is being delivered to you solely for your use in connection with the matters addressed herein and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity or used for any other purpose without our prior written consent. This e-mail communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and is subject to Attorney Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product protections. It may contain privileged information that is confidential, strictly prohibited, and exempt from disclosure under law. This transmittal via e-mail does not constitute waiver of any privilege. All privileges are asserted. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of any kind is strictly prohibited and actionable. If you have received this communication and/or its attachments, if any, in error, please notify me immediately by reply email, to email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone at (800) 672-7465, do not disclose its contents to anyone, and destroy the original.